Hello linuxers,
Can any1 pls. ans. my queries ? (1) What is the difference between Enterprise Linux 3.0 & RHL9.0 ?= ?
(2) What are the added features/advantages which 3.0 has ?
(= 3) What are the reasons behind the creation of Enterprise Linux 3.0 ? = (4) Amongst these which is the BEST, SIMPLEST and which has the MOST BUG= S ??? (i) RHL9.0 (ii) Fedora core1 (iii) Fedora core 2 (iv) Suse Linux =
Just doing a small survey, so I'll appreciate the feedback from a ll you guys.
Regards,
Abdul
References
Visible links Hidden links: 1. 3D"http://clients.rediff.com/signature/track_sig.asp"
Hello Abdul,
You can try spending sometime on reading up about FLOSS(Free Libre and Open Source which includes the paradigms of Free Software and Open Source)
www.fsf.org www.opensource.org
--- Abdul linuxfreak1@rediffmail.com wrote:
Can any1 pls. ans. my queries ? (1) What is the difference between Enterprise Linux 3.0 & RHL9.0 ?= ?
[snip]
RHL 9.0 no longer supported by Red Hat. Fedora is the supported community distro.
(2) What are the added features/advantages which 3.0 has ?
[snip]
RHEL 3.0 isn't any great shakes. The only reason one would use it is if you need to install any Enterprise Appln. Else grab a debian and you will be better off in many way.
Note: Debian tends to be a lil non friendly at first but sucks lesser than Red Hat later when you are used to it.
(= 3) What are the reasons behind the creation of Enterprise Linux 3.0 ?
[snip]
1:) $$$$$$$ and 2:) $$$$$$$
= (4) Amongst these which is the BEST, SIMPLEST and which has the MOST BUG= S ??? (i) RHL9.0 (ii) Fedora core1 (iii) Fedora core 2 (iv) Suse Linux
[snip]
No code that ever gets writted can be vouched to be 100% bug(lets call this unwanted feature) free.
Like humans, code too evolves over a period of time. Depending more so on the community and author surrounding the same.
Just doing a small survey, so I'll appreciate the feedback from a ll you guys.
[snip]
Look up google for more info pertaining to the same.
Trevor
Regards,
Abdul
References
Visible links Hidden links:
3D"http://clients.rediff.com/signature/track_sig.asp"
===== ( >- -< ) /~\ ______________________________________ /~\ | ) / Scaling FLOSS in the Enterprise \ (/ | |_|_ \ trevorwarren@yahoo.com / _|_| ____________________________________/
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Domains � Claim yours for only $14.70/year http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer
On Sunday 23 May 2004 13:39, Abdul wrote:
Hello linuxers,
Can any1 pls. ans. my queries ? (1) What is the difference between Enterprise Linux 3.0 & RHL9.0 ?=?
Both are redhat distros. Quite obviously you should be Calling up redhat.
(2) What are the added features/advantages which 3.0 has ?
Phone redhat
(=3) What are the reasons behind the creation of Enterprise Linux 3.0 ?
Money MOney MONEY. For less important reasons phone redhat
= (4) Amongst these which is the BEST, SIMPLEST and which has the MOST BUG=S ??? (i) RHL9.0 (ii) Fedora core1 (iii) Fedora core 2 (iv) Suse Linux
Your questions begets the answer. You are BIASING the respondents and missing the Greatest - Debian.
=
Just doing a small survey, so I'll appreciate the feedback from a ll you guys.
What is the survey about? Where are you going to publish this.
Abdul wrote:
Hello linuxers,
Can any1 pls. ans. my queries ? (1) What is the difference between Enterprise Linux 3.0 & RHL9.0 ?=
There is not much of a difference. The only visible differecne I can find is in what is the verision of some of the software (and the kernel)
(2) What are the added features/advantages which 3.0 has ?
(= 3) What are the reasons behind the creation of Enterprise Linux 3.0 ? =0A(4) Amongst these which is the BEST, SIMPLEST and which has the MOST BUG= ??? (i) RHL9.0 (ii) Fedora core1 (iii) Fedora core 2 (iv) Suse Linux =0A
I have used Fedora Core 1, RHL9 and Suse. I find Suse much more user friendly. Basically, their configuration tool YAST is the killer application.
Regards
Saswata
Morning Abdul,
Hello linuxers, Can any1 pls. ans. my queries ? (1) What is the difference between Enterprise Linux 3.0 & RHL9.0 ?= ?
<snip> It depends on which architecture u r looking for RHEL 3. but there are major difference between RHL 9/x86 & RHEL 3/x86.
max. RAM Support by normal/smp kernel RHL9/4Gb RHEL3/16Gb. ( Can go more then that. ).
max. RAM support by bigmem enterprise kernel RHL9/32Gb RHEL3/64Gb.
Maximum amount of virtual memory accessable per program RHL9/3Gb RHEL3/3.9Gb.
In CPU section its more or less identical but no of cpu support varies RHL9/8 RHEL3/32 logical.
In storage disk too its more or less same.
(2) What are the added features/advantages which 3.0 has ?
<snip> http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/features/ http://www.redhat.com/whitepapers/rhel/RHEL3ffbPDF.pdf
(= 3) What are the reasons behind the creation of Enterprise Linux 3.0 ?
<snip> Red Hat can answer it better.
= (4) Amongst these which is the BEST, SIMPLEST and which has the MOST BUG= S ??? (i) RHL9.0 (ii) Fedora core1 (iii) Fedora core 2 (iv) Suse Linux
<snip> Fedora Core1 Max. ( First Red Hat distro with Security Enhanced Linux. ) Fedora Core2 ( This is little improvment over Core1. ) RHL9 ( But no more support from Red Hat. ) Suse Linux ( Suse has many classification, which u wanted to know ? )
Just doing a small survey, so I'll appreciate the feedback from a ll you guys.
<snip> Will appreciate, if u browse and get the information from urls.
For ur help:
http://www.redhat.com http://www.suse.com http://www.enterpriselinux.org
Regards, Animesh.
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Domains � Claim yours for only $14.70/year http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer