Hi All,

I am Debian user and debian lenny on my embedded device with MIPSEL au 1xxx processor. I have kernel source code 2.6.28 provided by vendor also crosstool install on my system with following things.

a. binutils-2.15.tar.bz2 b. crosstool-0.43.tar.gz c. gcc-3.3.5.tar.bz2 (insted of this i am using gcc 3.4.4 provided by vendor) d. glibc-2.3.2.tar.bz2 e. glibc-linuxthreads-2.3.2.tar. bz2 f. linux-2.6.28.tar.gz (sourse code provided by vendor)

I am able to compile 2.6.28 and trying to compile 2.6.35 with same configuration as in .28 but when i did make I am getting error related to intramfs.cpio.sh and the file wasen there so i change the path for this file through menuconfig and using the cpio from /opt/linux2.6.28/usr/initramfs.cpio and it compiled but land up with following error. PFA image

lib/atomic64_test.c: In function `test_atomic64': lib/atomic64_test.c:24: error: `atomic64_t' undeclared (first use in this function) lib/atomic64_test.c:24: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once lib/atomic64_test.c:24: error: for each function it appears in.) lib/atomic64_test.c:24: error: parse error before "v" lib/atomic64_test.c:26: error: `v' undeclared (first use in this function) lib/atomic64_test.c:28: error: implicit declaration of function `atomic64_set' lib/atomic64_test.c:31: error: implicit declaration of function `atomic64_read' lib/atomic64_test.c:34: error: implicit declaration of function `atomic64_add' lib/atomic64_test.c:45: error: implicit declaration of function `atomic64_add_return' lib/atomic64_test.c:54: error: implicit declaration of function `atomic64_sub' lib/atomic64_test.c:65: error: implicit declaration of function `atomic64_sub_return' lib/atomic64_test.c:74: error: implicit declaration of function `atomic64_inc' lib/atomic64_test.c:80: error: implicit declaration of function `atomic64_inc_return' lib/atomic64_test.c:84: error: implicit declaration of function `atomic64_dec' lib/atomic64_test.c:90: error: implicit declaration of function `atomic64_dec_return' lib/atomic64_test.c:94: error: implicit declaration of function `atomic64_xchg' lib/atomic64_test.c:99: error: implicit declaration of function `atomic64_cmpxchg' lib/atomic64_test.c:108: error: implicit declaration of function `atomic64_add_unless' lib/atomic64_test.c:119: error: implicit declaration of function `atomic64_dec_if_positive' lib/atomic64_test.c:135: error: implicit declaration of function `atomic64_inc_not_zero' make[1]: *** [lib/atomic64_test.o] Error 1 make: *** [lib] Error 2

On 24 October 2011 14:58, Nishit Dave stargazer.dave@gmail.com wrote:

On Oct 24, 2011 1:58 PM, "Kunal Bharati" kunalbharati@gmail.com wrote:

...

test reply :)

-- Thanx, Kunal

good to see we are up again!

http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

:) thanks.

And I got the solution. By mistake I enabled the atomic module in kernel hijack.

By the way Kenneth I am unable to get meaning of whole sentence. I can just guess.

On 24 October 2011 16:23, kenneth gonsalves lawgon@thenilgiris.com wrote:

On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 15:27 +0530, Pravinkumar Chavan wrote:

...

I am Debian user and debian lenny on my embedded device with MIPSEL au 1xxx processor.

aha - no sooner does the list get resurrected than the top posters and thread hijackers come out in droves! welcome back Mumbai list - we love you. -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves

-- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Pravinkumar Chavan < pravinkumar.chavan@enrouteinc.com> wrote:

By the way Kenneth I am unable to get meaning of whole sentence. I can just guess.

keywords: "top posting", "thread hijack" Top posting is when you post above the quoted text, this reply is bottom posting. jtd answered what is hijack in previous email

Revant

On 24 October 2011 16:23, kenneth gonsalves lawgon@thenilgiris.com wrote:

aha - no sooner does the list get resurrected than the top posters and thread hijackers come out in droves! welcome back Mumbai list - we love you.

Oops I thought the list was dead . Nice to see it live back !

Welcome Mumbai :)

Regards, Pavithran

On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 11:12 -0400, Easwar Hariharan wrote:

...

good to see we are up again!

Glad to see we're back. For a time I'd become inactive and thought my GMail filters were blocking list mail. They weren't, and turns out we didn't even have a list, despite regular password reminder mails from the mailer daemon.

let us hope the admins come forward with a complete history of what went wrong and why it took so long to set it right and what measures have been taken to ensure that this does not happen again.