Hi Friends,
A good news is that our central government is also taking deep interest in promoting Linux in all area. Government wants various agencies to give some feedback on the information related to Linux. They have sent a draft to NCST also.
I think this mailing list is the best place where I can post the questions and get answers so that I can forward the information to our government. Please give as much input as you can.
I am directing the revised information/feedback format on "Linux India Initiatives" for your kind consideration and input. The format is as follows :
"Linux India Initiatives"
Information may kindly be furnised under the following heads : 1. Linux - The need; 2. Demand profile segments - such as Home, Education, Research, Govt, Defence, Business, Embedded systems etc. 3. Present scenario (International) vs competing products 4. Issues to resolve : (i) Indian Language Support (ii) Security (iii) Awareness/education (iv) Certification (v) Standardisation (vi) Service Model vs product model (vii) Identification of minimal set of application 5. Transition strategy - Unix to Linux, legacy port 6. Consortium for linux based collaborative Development? The Li18nux, OSDL, LSB...? 7. Action Plan
Kindly send your views/comments as soon as possible.
Thanks, Keyur
--- Keyur Shroff keyur@konark.ncst.ernet.in wrote:
Hi Friends, A good news is that our central government is also taking deep interest in promoting Linux in all area. Government Linux. They have sent a draft to NCST also.
[snip] This sounds damn interesting.......nd i think we shouldnt let the stone gather moss ny longer.
Lets probably meetup.......Lemee take this oppurtunity to invite all like minded gnu-luggers together so that we get this proposal in motion and are formally able to present a decent argument towards helpin the technology starved governement institutions drive down costs and increase productivity(lol...dont know if the last thing is possible..;))
I think this mailing list is the best place where I can post the questions and get answers so that I can forward the information to our government. Please give as much input as you can.
[snip] i personally will make all attempts to give u as much as possible.......and would also make an appeal to all the white hairs of the ilug-bom to donate some amount of their precious time on this.
Last but not the least Mr.Keyur ...........we would love to give u all the info u want. But......lemme stress BUT.......
If u want us to really help, do put the ilug-bom in touch with the actual decision makers as we personally would like to voice our concern towards the increasin deployment of gnu-linux for all our government institutions nationwide.
If u need nythin u r welcom to get in touch with me off the list. I could arange for some of the white hairs of the ilug-bom to meet nd go ahead with full steam.
Trevor Warren
I am directing the revised information/feedback format on "Linux India Initiatives" for your kind consideration and input. The format is as follows :
"Linux India Initiatives"
Information may kindly be furnised under the following heads :
- Linux - The need;
Kindly send your views/comments as soon as possible.
Thanks, Keyur
===== ( >- GNU/LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< ) /~\ __ http://www.qmailtheeasyway.com __ /~\ | ) / mailto: trevorwarren@yahoo.com \ (/ | |_|_ \ Urgent ->9820349221@maxtouch.co.in / _|_| ___________________________________/
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Trevor Warren wrote:
If u want us to really help, do put the ilug-bom in touch with the actual decision makers as we personally would like to voice our concern towards the increasin deployment of gnu-linux for all our government institutions nationwide.
Our government is in the process of forming something like "Linux India Consortium". All technology vendors like IBM, RedHat, Caldera, Intel, etc and other technology developers like NCST, IITs, etc will be members of the consortium. I'll appeal personally to our government to allow all ILUGs to join this consortium.
Meanwhile I have to send this information before Monday. So please give as much information as you can via e-mail before Monday.
If u need nythin u r welcom to get in touch with me off the list. I could arange for some of the white hairs of the ilug-bom to meet nd go ahead with full steam.
Thanks, Keyur
--- Keyur Shroff keyur@konark.ncst.ernet.in wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Trevor Warren wrote: Meanwhile I have to send this information before Monday. So please give as much information as you can via e-mail before Monday.
[snip] u can depend on us for that........i think in a few hrs from now i'll do my post nd wish that my colleagues do their due too..;)
Trevor Warren
If u need nythin u r welcom to get in touch with
me
off the list. I could arange for some of the white hairs of the ilug-bom to meet nd go ahead with
full
steam.
Thanks, Keyur
===== ( >- GNU/LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< ) /~\ __ http://www.qmailtheeasyway.com __ /~\ | ) / mailto: trevorwarren@yahoo.com \ (/ | |_|_ \ Urgent ->9820349221@maxtouch.co.in / _|_| ___________________________________/
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Well this calls for a meet...
wat do ya say guys.....
Best Regards, -Mitul Limbani (mitul 2 mitul.com)
Trevor Warren writes:
--- Keyur Shroff keyur@konark.ncst.ernet.in wrote:
Hi Friends, A good news is that our central government is also taking deep interest in promoting Linux in all area. Government Linux. They have sent a draft to NCST also.
[snip] This sounds damn interesting.......nd i think we shouldnt let the stone gather moss ny longer.
Lets probably meetup.......Lemee take this oppurtunity to invite all like minded gnu-luggers together so that we get this proposal in motion and are formally able to present a decent argument towards helpin the technology starved governement institutions drive down costs and increase productivity(lol...dont know if the last thing is possible..;))
I think this mailing list is the best place where I can post the questions and get answers so that I can forward the information to our government. Please give as much input as you can.
[snip] i personally will make all attempts to give u as much as possible.......and would also make an appeal to all the white hairs of the ilug-bom to donate some amount of their precious time on this.
Last but not the least Mr.Keyur ...........we would love to give u all the info u want. But......lemme stress BUT.......
If u want us to really help, do put the ilug-bom in touch with the actual decision makers as we personally would like to voice our concern towards the increasin deployment of gnu-linux for all our government institutions nationwide.
If u need nythin u r welcom to get in touch with me off the list. I could arange for some of the white hairs of the ilug-bom to meet nd go ahead with full steam.
Trevor Warren
I am directing the revised information/feedback format on "Linux India Initiatives" for your kind consideration and input. The format is as follows :
"Linux India Initiatives"
Information may kindly be furnised under the following heads :
- Linux - The need;
Kindly send your views/comments as soon as possible.
Thanks, Keyur
===== ( >- GNU/LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< ) /~\ __ http://www.qmailtheeasyway.com __ /~\ | ) / mailto: trevorwarren@yahoo.com \ (/ | |_|_ \ Urgent ->9820349221@maxtouch.co.in / _|_| ___________________________________/
Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
--- Mitul Limbani mitul@mitul.com wrote:
Well this calls for a meet...
[snip] can we hav a meet online luggers.....i hav a really hectic schedule......
Trevor Warren
wat do ya say guys.....
Best Regards, -Mitul Limbani (mitul 2 mitul.com)
===== ( >- GNU/LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< ) /~\ __ http://www.qmailtheeasyway.com __ /~\ | ) / mailto: trevorwarren@yahoo.com \ (/ | |_|_ \ Urgent ->9820349221@maxtouch.co.in / _|_| ___________________________________/
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Trevor Warren wrote:
Lets probably meetup.......Lemee take this oppurtunity to invite all like minded gnu-luggers together so that we get this proposal in motion and are formally able to present a decent argument towards helpin the technology starved governement institutions
[snip]
u can depend on us for that........i think in a few hrs from now i'll do my post nd wish that my colleagues do their due too..;)
Hey Trevor! I have yet not received any mail from you guys. What happend!? Have you prepared any draft?
- Keyur
Hi all, Could u kindly have a look at my screenshot in the below mentioned URL. http://www.columbia.edu/~bbb2004/snapshot2.jpg
If one observes the gkrellm program on the right of the screenshot, one will see that the "proc"(number of processes? - correct me if wrong) follows the pattern of the net usage very closely. I was wondering if this is just a coincidence or is there some underlying complexity that i am missing. Please enlighten me. Orca.
--- Keyur Shroff keyur@konark.ncst.ernet.in wrote:
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Trevor Warren wrote:
Hey Trevor! I have yet not received any mail from you guys. What happend!? Have you prepared any draft?
[snip] yep...i hav....
am sendin it to u in .5 hrs.
Trevor Warren
- Keyur
===== ( >- GNU/LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< ) /~\ __ http://www.qmailtheeasyway.com __ /~\ | ) / mailto: trevorwarren@yahoo.com \ (/ | |_|_ \ Urgent ->9820349221@maxtouch.co.in / _|_| ___________________________________/
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/
--- Keyur Shroff keyur@konark.ncst.ernet.in wrote:
Hi Friends,
[snip] Following below is my contribution to Mr. Keyur requests.
Dear luggers u'll r free to debate and change them asap and also point out and correct the various errors and ommisions in the doc.
Alll but not the least...dont spam or flame me....i am trying to help out. Meet me face-2-face nd we can slug it out.....:))..lol
Mr. Keyur....there 2 some points that i still havent addressed......cause it'll take some more time, nd i cant afford that today. I'll finish that by tonite and have them emailed to this list and to you for further debate and action.
Trevor Warren
The format is as follows :
"Linux India Initiatives"
Information may kindly be furnised under the following heads :
- Linux - The need;
[snip]
!!! All my references to Linux henceforth are pay symbolic respect to the Efforts of GNU which some of my dear brethren would insist to term Gnu-Linux. !!!
Open source software is different from traditional software in that it holds no secrets -- the software's 'source code' is free for the end user to examine, modify, or build on. With traditional proprietary software (the kind you buy in the shrink-wrapped box at stores), the source code is never released and the inner-workings of the software are secret, not that it matters to all users.
As admitted in an internal Microsoft memo "the intrinsic parallelism and free idea exchange in OSS [Open Source Software] has benefits that are not replicable with our [Microsoft's] current licensing model and therefore present a long term developer mindshare threat [to Microsoft]."
"The ability of the OSS process to collect and harness the collective IQ of thousands of individuals across the Internet is simply amazing," the Microsoft memo continues. "More importantly, OSS evangelization scales with the size of the Internet much faster than our own evangelization efforts."
Linux is one of the most open of any system to date. It not only benefits from the almost thirty years of development of Unix OSs, but extends the Unix model in new ways. Some mistakenly believe that Linux's main strength is that it is Unix, or that it is a free version of Unix. In fact, Linux's main strength is that it is developed with an intrinsically better development model that debatably has the best track record of any system yet devised.
The Internet itself is Open Source Software's poster child, since it was constructed of components built almost exclusively under the Open Source model. Many, in fact, have likened Linux today to the Internet in 1990 (used only by the technically savvy, seeing yearly exponential growth, completely open, and perhaps poised to take over the world).
Open Source is doing what God, government, and market have failed to do. It is putting powerful technology within the reach of cash-poor but idea-rich people. Analysts could quibble about whether that is creating or merely releasing value, but we could do with a bit of either. And yes, that is revolutionary.
The need for Gnu-Linux is expressed no less than in the Government's requirements for the underprivelaged to have computer access at school. The need is there. The hardware is there. But, the money for Microsoft software is not. Linux is, and will continue to rapidly bridge the gap through its high ROI (Return On Investment) as compared to any other Commercially available N.O.S(Network Operating System) and Desktop Operating System avaiilable today.
This movement with the right solution standing in front of the floodgates of a technological revolution will survive the currents of change. Change brings uncertainty and uncertainity brings chaos, but also a ray of hope figures through them all, hope that rekindles the fire of freedom. Freedom to SHARE, freedom to INNOVATE, freedom to ENHANCE and above all freedom to LEARN .....
--> Richard M. Stallman on Free Software making sense for India......
Free software is not only a matter of freedom, but for developing countries such as India, the issue may be price too." In candid acknowledgement of rampant unauthorised copying of software in India, Stallman suggested Free Software as a solution. "If India had to pay for all the licenses of Windows used in the country, it could run into billions of dollars. India can save a tremendous amount of money by not using Windows and other proprietary software packages. India can take massive advantage of Free Software by making an active campaign to discourage the use of proprietary software, and actively involving any free software that is necessary to replace proprietary software, which at the moment might seem to some people as essential.
"You should be able to do every job with your computer without giving up your freedom. You shouldn't be faced with a situation where you want to do a certain job with your computer but the only way to do it is with some non-free program that doesn't respect your freedom."
- Demand profile segments - such as Home,
Education, Research, Govt, Defence, Business, Embedded systems etc.
[snip]
There is no question of debate about Gnu-Linux being suited for the server front which has been won by us aldready.
--> The netcraft survey for Apache(Another Freely avaialable Webserver that runs on Linux)
http://www.netcraft.com/survey/
Top Developers
Developer February2002 Percent March2002 Percent Change
Apache 22462777 58.43 20492088 53.76 -4.67 Microsoft 11198727 29.13 12968860 34.02 4.89 iPlanet 1123701 2.92 889857 2.33 -0.59 Zeus 837968 2.18 855103 2.24 0.0
What remains to be seen is how far is Gnu-Linux able to deliver on the Desktop front. As of now there are numerous gnu-Linux distributions that cater to the desktop segment which are easier to install and use than any Operating from M$icrosoft itself...... and in most cases and doesnt require a honcho techie to install and get running.
A very simple example....just today i tried the Mandrake 8.2 install which took 25 mins flat without a single reboot & during the whole process installed all the goodies that would put any Microsoft user at comfort. Ofcourse, the learning curve is still there, but what the heck there is always a first time, so why not Linux..........
There aldready is a huge persence of Free Software (like Linux) in the various IIT's and IIS'es ,DRDO and major research institutions all over India being made use of for various research and educational purposes.
- Present scenario (International) vs competing
products
[snip] Worldwide it has been a trend that Educational and Research institutions have been the first to take up to Linux and various other Free Software initiatives both in terms of deploying them internally and spurring their growth. Introduction of Free Software linux Linux in various avenues of Governance has been slow to folow and is still trying to keep up pace. Any of my fellow brethren from the various Educational/Research institutions will vouch for the fact.
With the issues of corporate governance and e-governance taking pole position among the various other initiatives being spear headedby various governments all over the country it makes all the more sense for us to be making it mandatory for the Politburo and our Policy makers to make it mandatory to make use of Free Software as much as possible and WHEREEVER there are alternatives available to commercially available software.....
- Issues to resolve : (i) Indian Language Support (ii) Security (iii) Awareness/education (iv) Certification (v) Standardisation (vi) Service Model vs product model (vii) Identification of minimal set of
application
- Transition strategy - Unix to Linux, legacy port
[snip]
- Consortium for linux based collaborative
Development? The Li18nux, OSDL, LSB...?
[snip]
- Action Plan
[snip]
Kindly send your views/comments as soon as possible.
Thanks, Keyur
===== ( >- GNU/LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< ) /~\ __ http://www.qmailtheeasyway.com __ /~\ | ) / mailto: trevorwarren@yahoo.com \ (/ | |_|_ \ Urgent ->9820349221@maxtouch.co.in / _|_| ___________________________________/
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Many many thanks Mr Trevor Warren. You have nicely put your thoughts. It seems to me that not many people on this list are really interested in promoting Linux. Or that they have not taken this very seriously. Or they don't have much faith in our Government.
But let me make it very clear to you luggers that our Government is really very keen in promoting Linux. The only hurdle in this entire exercise is that some proprietary software developers are trying (and will try continuously) to change the thinking of our Government. We, as luggers, should try our level best to send our message to the government.
Also I think that this discussion can be continued on this list since it is related to Linux.
Trevor, I think we should keep away from cursing any OS/software developer while sending our draft to the government. Instead of putting any name we can write "proprietary software developer". However we can keep comparison chart between Windows and Linux.
Also we can not put the following para unless we have some documentary evidence.
As admitted in an internal Microsoft memo "the intrinsic parallelism and free idea exchange in OSS [Open Source Software] has benefits that are not replicable with our [Microsoft's] current licensing model and therefore present a long term developer mindshare threat [to Microsoft]."
[snip]
Open Source is doing what God, government, and market have failed to do. [snip]
Hey, don't forget whom we are sending this document to :-) So I suggest removing the above line.
- Issues to resolve : (i) Indian Language Support (ii) Security (iii) Awareness/education (iv) Certification (v) Standardisation (vi) Service Model vs product model (vii) Identification of minimal set of
application
- Transition strategy - Unix to Linux, legacy port
[snip]
- Consortium for linux based collaborative
Development? The Li18nux, OSDL, LSB...?
[snip]
- Action Plan
[snip]
Can other luggers give some input in the above?
Thanks and regards, Keyur
Sometime Today, Trevor Warren assembled some asciibets to say:
Open source software is different from traditional software in that it holds no secrets -- the software's 'source code' is free for the end user to examine, modify, or build on. With traditional
Not true. Open source simply gives you access to the source code. It makes no provision for the modification or redistribution of that code. Free software gives you that freedom.
The Internet itself is Open Source Software's poster child, since it was constructed of components built almost exclusively under the Open Source model. Many, in fact, have likened Linux today to the Internet in 1990 (used only by the technically savvy, seeing yearly exponential growth, completely open, and perhaps poised to take over the world).
The seeds for the Internet were sown in 1969. It grew as a large experiment and yes, was used by geeks and scientists only.
Open Source is doing what God, government, and market have failed to do. It is putting powerful technology within the reach of cash-poor
Well, not what God, or government have failed to do. It's just that corporates have tried to stop it forever. The concept of free software has been around as long as there have been programmers. Proprietary software is only about 30 years old.
Philip
Philip wrote:
Sometime Today, Trevor Warren assembled some asciibets to say:
Open source software is different from traditional software in that it holds no secrets -- the software's 'source code' is free for the end user to examine, modify, or build on. With traditional
Not true. Open source simply gives you access to the source code. It makes no provision for the modification or redistribution of that code. Free software gives you that freedom.
Not true!
http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.html
<start quote> 3. Derived Works
The license must allow modifications and derived works, and must allow them to be distributed under the same terms as the license of the original software.
Rationale: The mere ability to read source isn't enough to support independent peer review and rapid evolutionary selection. For rapid evolution to happen, people need to be able to experiment with and redistribute modifications.
<end quote>
Sameer.
===== -- MTech Student Reconfigurable Computing Lab KReSIT, IIT-Bombay
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Sometime on Apr 17, Sameer D. Sahasrabuddhe assembled some asciibets to say:
Not true. Open source simply gives you access to the source code. It makes no provision for the modification or redistribution of that code. Free software gives you that freedom.
Not true!
Ok, I was really talking about software who's source is open, but not free, like pine for example. You are allowed to see the source, compile it and redistribute it. However, if you modify it, these modifications must remain local to your site. You cannot redistribute modified versions of the software. You are however allowed to distribute patches to the original source.
Anyway, the difference isn't that important to us, but it may make a difference with policy makers where the details of the licence really do come into play. It is important to ensure correct nomenclature.
All free software licences are opensource, all opensource licences are not free.
hi,
how to run both client and server program in linux on one PC. do you have any idea about networking discussion group or pan club. bye
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/
at one time only one program runs unless we use multithreading.is there any command in linux which will run both programs at same time
--- Philip S Tellis philip.tellis@iname.com wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, ketan shah wrote:
how to run both client and server program in linux
on one PC.
just run it.
If you ask a specific question, you'll get a specific answer.
-- One Bell System - it works.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, ketan shah wrote:
at one time only one program runs unless we use multithreading.is there any command in linux which will run both programs at same time
what do you mean only one program runs? even if you use multithreading, you're still running just one program.
the question is what is stopping you from running two programs? linux definitely does not stop you, there are no special commands required. you can run as many programs as you want.
--- "Sameer D. Sahasrabuddhe" sam_buddhe@yahoo.com wrote:
Philip wrote:
Not true. Open source simply gives you access to
the source code.
It makes no provision for the modification or
redistribution of that
code. Free software gives you that freedom.
Not true!
[snip] hey sameer........
c'mon givve me a break.........thk me for atleast getiin all ur asses off from ground Zero........and spawning all this debate which led to the timely creation of the DOC for keyur.
Vry1 can point out flaws.....very few can appreciate.....
The errors and ommissions r for all of u'll to correct......dude...i really dont pay much heed to the morality part of it......I would rather spend my time workin on the ground realities doin all that i can to c that gnu-Linux makes inroads whereever i go.....and at the grass root level too, u know me well by now i guess...
No offence meant sameer........dont get me wrong...
Trevor Warren
<start quote> 3. Derived Works
The license must allow modifications and derived works, and must allow them to be distributed under the same terms as the license of the original software.
Rationale: The mere ability to read source isn't enough to support independent peer review and rapid evolutionary selection. For rapid evolution to happen, people need to be able to experiment with and redistribute modifications.
<end quote>
Sameer.
===== ( >- GNU/LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< ) /~\ __ http://www.qmailtheeasyway.com __ /~\ | ) / mailto: trevorwarren@yahoo.com \ (/ | |_|_ \ Urgent ->9820349221@maxtouch.co.in / _|_| ___________________________________/
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/
--- Philip S Tellis philip.tellis@iname.com wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Trevor Warren wrote:
hey sameer........
c'mon givve me a break.........thk me for
atleast
hey trevor. I think he was correcting me, not you.
[snip]
man.....u did a swell job of penning down those words for the DOC.....i dunnow who could hav done it better...;)
Wat say............should we take the initiative to hold a LIVE DEMO for the govt dudes.....i think this can spur the officials to c 1st hand wat Free Software can do for them all....
Trevor Warren
-- "What terrible way to die." "There are no good ways." -- Sulu and Kirk, "That Which Survives", stardate unknown
===== ( >- GNU/LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< ) /~\ __ http://www.qmailtheeasyway.com __ /~\ | ) / mailto: trevorwarren@yahoo.com \ (/ | |_|_ \ Urgent ->9820349221@maxtouch.co.in / _|_| ___________________________________/
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Keyur Shroff wrote:
"Linux India Initiatives"
Information may kindly be furnised under the following heads :
- Linux - The need;
- Demand profile segments - such as Home, Education, Research, Govt, Defence, Business, Embedded systems etc.
India is a developing country, and as such, we should look to finding low cost solutions while not compromising on quality. While our software industry has been successful world-wide in providing solutions for business consumers, software as a product remains too costly within our own country. We must also realise that much of the software in use within our country comes from outside. This in turn translates to a large sum of Indian Rupees flowing into foreign companies.
Most proprietary software comes with a licence agreement that restricts the redistribution of the software. Persons who do redistribute the software, in violation of the licence, are labelled as software pirates. While it is accpeted that software piracy is a problem and must be curtailed, it is also possible that we aren't striking at the cause of the problem.
What most software consumers fail to realise, is that software is not a product that one buys off the shelf like a tube of toothpaste. The reproduction costs of software are negligible and there are no raw materials involved. The software industry is therefore falls into the services sector rather than the manufacturing sector. More time is spent in providing support for software than is spent in developing it.
Once this is understood, it becomes clear that the software itself should not be priced highly, but after sales service and support should be charged for.
This is where the GNU/Linux system fits in. The licencing terms of this system state clearly that anyone has the right to obtain and redistribute copies of the system. The software is provided free of cost.
This immediately affects the business of software pirates, as there is no way for them to sell at a lower price that which is already free. Further more, it translates into greater cost effectiveness for the consumer.
There then arises the question of support and services, which is what this sector is all about. As mentioned earlier, software falls in the services sector, and therefore, the primary business for linux vendors is in providing services.
This is one area in which India can play a big role, and provide these services to the rest of the world.
As consumers too, one must realise the difference between support contracts for proprietary software and free software. Proprietary support agreements give you support only for the systems that you have purchased support for. In other words, if you own ten systems, but only have licences for five of them, you will get support for those five only.
With free software, this is not the case. Any software contract that you sign with your vendor is independent of the number of copies of the software that you own. Most vendors will most likely just require that the distribution that you use was one published by them.
There are several segments in which linux can play a major role, and is ready to do so at present.
Linux and other free Unixen like *BSD have been very popular as servers. These systems are robust and have average uptimes that run into years. Add to this the ability of linux to emulate legacy file servers like Windows NT and Novell Netware (using samba and mars-nwe), and you have a system that can do well to replace any server running these systems.
Businesses could do well to adopt it if only on the server side. The reduction in costs would be tremendous, and uptime would increase.
One also needs to consider that a well set up linux system needs almost no system administration or maintenance.
When considering client side applications of linux, we would need to divide the business sector into those that develop software, and those that use it. Software developers may need to use systems for which they develop, ie, someone developing for Windows would have to test his software on Windows.
For persons who simply use software, it is much easier to use a linux based system. All software needed can be installed centrally, with client machines acting as simple X displays. This can significantly reduce the hardware requirements of the company, while also ensuring that a sysadmin needs to maintain only a single machine rather than the fifty machines that the company has.
Most office productivity tools are available for linux. Word processors, spread sheets, and presentation utilities exist with several variants avaialable depending on your preferences. Legacy applications written for DOS or Windows can be run in emulated environments like dosemu or Wine.
For research institutes, the main appeal of linux would have to be the large community that uses it and the spirit of sharing ideas between groups. In many ways, the development of the GNU/Linux system has proceeded in much the same way as science has progressed over the last two centuries. There is open collaboration between groups at distant locations with everyone benefitting.
With large numbers of universities around the world using some variant of unix or linux as their base systems, persons in India could benefit from the existing knowledge and experiences of these.
This large community of scientific users has resulted in a plethora of software written specifically to aid in research, and built to run on linux based systems.
Educational institutes, at least those running courses on engineering and computers benefit for the same reasons. Additionally, students of computer science and engineering benefit from having the source code of a working operating system to look at and experiment with. Regardless of the field of computer science that they specialise in, having access to the source code for the tools they use and possibly try to develop will help them eventually.
Another place where educational institutes can benefit is from the ready availability of projects that can be given to students as classroom assignments or semester projects. By working on an existing project, possibly collaborating with other developers around the world, the student gets a good idea of what it is like to work in a team and develop quality software, rather than writing the same old ten line assignments every year. Building a working software that is actually used by people, and then providing support to them builds in the student a sense of achievement and responsibility.
This can only work towards producing a much more capable work force graduating from college every year.
School education can also benefit from the use of linux. Cost reduction would be the primary reason. Schools would however benefit from the large amount of educational software available for linux. Students of higher classes can even be recruited to write software for students of lower classes. Computers are already taught in school at all levels, but what is taught leaves a lot to be desired.
At present students learn to use specific software, as a result of which, they are none the wiser when confronted with a new system. Giving students some variety in what they learn, or even allowing them to learn how to get the job done rather than how to use a tool would leave them better off later in life.
There is of course a lot more that I could write about this topic, but right now my eyes are closing and I can't stay focussed any longer.
Will try and write something about why developers benefit from developing for free software.
Ciao,
Philip
----- Original Message ----- From: "Philip S Tellis" philip.tellis@iname.com Subject: Re: [ILUG-BOM] Promoting Linux
Ok...i havent been chking my mail for some time..so i missed all this action, and this thread has been really interesting....great inputs from some of the guys here but i thought i'll play a little devil's advocate here...
While it is accpeted that software piracy is a problem and must be curtailed, it is also possible that we aren't striking at the cause of the problem.
The cause is not wanting to pay...greed....wanting a free ride..plain ol human wanting !
What most software consumers fail to realise, is that software is not a product that one buys off the shelf like a tube of toothpaste. The reproduction costs of software are negligible and there are no raw materials involved. The software industry is therefore falls into the services sector rather than the manufacturing sector. More time is spent in providing support for software than is spent in developing it.
The "negligible cost" that you are referring to is the cost of making the delivery mechanism(CDs), and not the product per se. There are development costs..i need to keep fixing bugs, i need to keep adding features.. to do that, i need to keep testing..i need to keep talking to my customers about the performance of my product...and i need to keep paying salaries to my developers. and i need to keep paying bills... You cannot compare the traditional model of raw materials + labour = unit cost with software products...
Once this is understood, it becomes clear that the software itself should not be priced highly, but after sales service and support should be charged for.
Why? It took me so much time/energy/brains to make the product..why shouldnt i charge for it? And what is 'high price"? its relative to what money i'll save for the client...or what value he attaches to my product! What if the client doesnt require support? where do i make money?
As consumers too, one must realise the difference between support contracts for proprietary software and free software. Proprietary support agreements give you support only for the systems that you have purchased support for. In other words, if you own ten systems, but only have licences for five of them, you will get support for those five only.
Whoa! when i sell support, i sign Service level agreements... To provide quick and efficient service, i need to have an idea of the number of users that i will have to service..can i service them properly if i dont know how many systems they have? How do i decide how many engineers i need on standby? The rationale behind pricing support per user is sound business logic...the more users the client has, more the manpower/resources i need for giving him proper service..
well..just some points that i thought needed a different viewpoint....
regards, kishor PS: btw, does anyone remember the name of the guy who trademarked "Linux" in his name in India?
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, aaaaarrrgghhh wrote:
Once this is understood, it becomes clear that the software itself should not be priced highly, but after sales service and support should be charged for.
Why? It took me so much time/energy/brains to make the product..why shouldnt i charge for it? And what is 'high price"? its relative to
because you did not spend time/energy/brains to make the product.
1. Most general purpose software already exists 2. You did not spend your brains trying to develop whatever it is you developed, because the concepts required to develop it are already well known. If they aren't well known, then you're in the wrong job. You should be a pioneer, not a software seller.
If you make specialised software, then yes, you must charge for it, and charge anything you want for it. The simple fact is, you divide the development costs by the number of users. A word processor is used by everyone, so the development cost per user is very small. A specialised environmental controller for a greenhouse is used by maybe one person, you charge him a lot.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Philip S Tellis" philip.tellis@iname.com Subject: Re: [ILUG-BOM] Promoting Linux
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, aaaaarrrgghhh wrote:
Once this is understood, it becomes clear that the software itself
should
not be priced highly, but after sales service and support should be charged for.
Why? It took me so much time/energy/brains to make the product..why shouldnt i charge for it? And what is 'high price"? its relative to
because you did not spend time/energy/brains to make the product.
I think ur restricting this discussion to use of open source/free software, while i took your earlier mail to be a commentary on the software industry as a whole.
- Most general purpose software already exists
- You did not spend your brains trying to develop whatever it is you
developed, because the concepts required to develop it are already well known. If they aren't well known, then you're in the wrong job. You should be a pioneer, not a software seller.
If you make specialised software, then yes, you must charge for it, and charge anything you want for it. The simple fact is, you divide the development costs by the number of users. A word processor is used by everyone, so the development cost per user is very small. A specialised environmental controller for a greenhouse is used by maybe one person, you charge him a lot.
If i'm a company like Infosys/SAP, then I'm designing software to make companies more productive.. Every project requires analysis...design...i'm definitely using my knowledge/brains/experience! Even if i provide a simple web interface for configuring an application - i'm using some skill and time.. As for your argument abt 'the concepts being known' ..it doesnt hold water becoz i'm not charging anyone for the concept.....i'm charging them for the tangible benefit they will get from using my product, which is really my cost of implementing that concept. And who said that a pioneer cant be a seller? Most companies start from an idea! as for the economics, its not as simple as division by no. of users..but i'll skip that for now.. ;-)
regards, kishor