On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, RAHUL MORE wrote:
I have two linux 6.2 servers installed at 2 diff networks connected
Maybe we should just start ignoring these kinds of mails.
Here's the procmail recipe:
:0 *^Subject: .*(Re: ?)* [ILUG-BOM] (no subject) /dev/null
Philip
i do agree
Philip S Tellis wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, RAHUL MORE wrote:
I have two linux 6.2 servers installed at 2 diff networks connected
Maybe we should just start ignoring these kinds of mails.
Here's the procmail recipe:
:0 *^Subject: .*(Re: ?)* [ILUG-BOM] (no subject) /dev/null
Philip
----- Original Message ----- From: "sachin" sachin@mediaibc.com To: linuxers@mm.ilug-bom.org.in Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 3:34 PM Subject: [ILUG-BOM] (no subject) --<<< STOP THIS
i do agree
May be we can stop these mails at the server levels its self ? Saves us download time too :-)
Regards Saswata
Philip S Tellis wrote:
Maybe we should just start ignoring these kinds of mails.
Here's the procmail recipe:
:0 *^Subject: .*(Re: ?)* [ILUG-BOM] (no subject) /dev/null
Philip
Saswata Banerjee & Associates wrote:
May be we can stop these mails at the server levels its self ? Saves us download time too :-)
Why don't we also filter out all mails that contain a standalone 'u' anywhere in the text. ;-))
Then again, everyone might not agree with me. :)
Manish
-
Manish Jethani -
Philip S Tellis -
RAHUL MORE -
sachin -
Saswata Banerjee & Associates