Works as usual. Except that alsa seems to have a problem. Upgraded kernel to 2.6.17-3. everything ok. I wanted sdiscover to skip probing the pci bus. but disable pci in discover.conf. discover-autoskip.conf and discover.conf-2.6 does not seem to have any effect.
On 7/18/06, Steven Joseph stevenjose@gmail.com wrote:
Is kde 3.3 faster than 3.5 ?
yes. much faster.
Ananth
On 7/18/06, Ananth A writetoananth@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/18/06, Steven Joseph stevenjose@gmail.com wrote:
Is kde 3.3 faster than 3.5 ?
oops, i meant 3.5 is much faster than 3.3.
Ananth
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 10:04 am, Ananth A wrote:
On 7/18/06, Ananth A writetoananth@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/18/06, Steven Joseph stevenjose@gmail.com wrote:
Is kde 3.3 faster than 3.5 ?
oops, i meant 3.5 is much faster than 3.3.
On what distro. Afaik u cant run kde3.5.3 on sarge without breaking things badly.
On 7/18/06, jtd jtd@mtnl.net.in wrote:
oops, i meant 3.5 is much faster than 3.3.
On what distro. Afaik u cant run kde3.5.3 on sarge without breaking things badly.
not the sub-sub-version but just the sub-version.... (3.3 and 3.5) not (3.5.2 and 3.5.3).
i found 3.5.0 at least 2-3x faster than 3.3.0, both were compiled from source on a gentoo system (not using the gentoo portages).
Ananth
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 01:18 am, Steven Joseph wrote:
On Monday 17 July 2006 15:03, jtd wrote:
Works as usual. Except that alsa seems to have a problem. Upgraded kernel to 2.6.17-3. everything ok.
Will install alsa from source. 0.8 works well on another box. Still cant figure out why discover is hell bent on discovering stuff i dont want it to discover. maybe i should uninstall discover. The snddevices script seems to be missing. Had to create adsp link in /dev manually.
Same problem with me too ... same solution. Is kde 3.3 faster than 3.5 ?
Dont know. But should be bug fixes. Kde4 according to the grapevine is going to be kool. On Suse 10.1 LFY kde3. did not seem to be any faster or different.
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 10:50 am, jtd wrote:
Same problem with me too ... same solution. Is kde 3.3 faster than 3.5 ?
Dont know. But should be bug fixes. Kde4 according to the grapevine is going to be kool. On Suse 10.1 LFY kde3. did not seem to be any faster or different.
Oops that should be On Suse 10.1 LFY kde3.5 .2 did not seem to be any faster or different. To use 3.5.3 u would have to switch to sid or etch, which would then be an incorrect comparison.
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 10:50, jtd wrote:
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 10:50 am, jtd wrote:
Same problem with me too ... same solution. Is kde 3.3 faster than 3.5 ?
Dont know. But should be bug fixes. Kde4 according to the grapevine is going to be kool. On Suse 10.1 LFY kde3. did not seem to be any faster or different.
Oops that should be On Suse 10.1 LFY kde3.5 .2 did not seem to be any faster or different. To use 3.5.3 u would have to switch to sid or etch, which would then be an incorrect comparison.
i think the version shipped with suse is slower
Debian kde 3.3 is snappy but i missed some things i got used to in 3.5 ... like access keys in konqueror .. it didnt work in 3.3 i find that kubuntu 6.06 .. kde is reall snappy. I decided to stick with kubuntu cuz good support, free cds, aptitude, apt!!! nice.
suse has got to do something about yast ... its reall slow compared to aptitude.
i tried atp4rpm on it ... but was messy.
Also suse super (SLICK) is reall fast and its got apt by default ... but on the long run, u get into dependency hell. It uses some packages that are not in the suse dvd.
Steven
-
Ananth A -
jtd -
Steven Joseph