It is clear that they have manipulated and won an important round. Now, the only way is to make some Government/s appeal in the matter within 60 days, otherwise, the corrupt one wins this game.
It may be worth trying an effort (in the form of a strong-focused campaign) wherein Linux users come together (virtually, to begin with) and educate various Governments. It will be a worthy cause to make this effort and also we test the strength of the community (with a view to improve it further as a result of this test). We need our world to be ours and we need to take it away from the corrupt ones. Shall we begin?
==================================================== Microsoft wins battle for OOXML approval http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39378350,00.htm
The International Organization for Standardization has officially approved Microsoft's OOXML specification as a standard.
The news confirms documents leaked on Tuesday were genuine. Three-quarters of the "Principal Countries" involved in the vote gave their approval (at least two-thirds were needed) and just 14 percent of participating members of ISO and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) disapproved (under a quarter was needed).
According to ISO's Wednesday statement: "Subject to there being no formal appeals from ISO/IEC national bodies in the next two months, the International Standard will accordingly proceed to publication."
Although there have been allegations of voting irregularities within some of the national standards bodies that in turn participated in the ISO vote, no national body has yet made a formal appeal to ISO.
One prominent example had been an objection from Steve Pepper, the chairman of Standard Norge's joint technical committee, which he faxed directly to the ISO. In the letter, he claimed that 80 percent of the committee had been against the OOXML standard being passed — Norway officially recorded a vote of approval.
However, a spokesperson for Standard Norge told ZDNet.co.uk on Wednesday that the organisation had not made a formal appeal to ISO, and did not intend to do so. "One of the committee members sent a fax to ISO about this matter, but he did that directly and not through us," the spokesperson said.
A spokesperson for ISO confirmed on Wednesday that it had not yet received any formal objections to the OOXML voting process, and refused to comment on the reports of voting irregularities within national bodies.
--- With best wishes for Unity in thinking, feeling and action.
Sudhir Gandotra. 98-101-20918
You don't need violence to shake the world Treat Others As You Would Have Them Treat You www.humanistmovement.org
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Sudhir Gandotra sudhir@openlx.com wrote:
It is clear that they have manipulated and won an important round. Now, the only way is to make some Government/s appeal in the matter within 60 days, otherwise, the corrupt one wins this game.
It may be worth trying an effort (in the form of a strong-focused campaign) wherein Linux users come together (virtually, to begin with) and educate various Governments. It will be a worthy cause to make this effort and also we test the strength of the community (with a view to improve it further as a result of this test). We need our world to be ours and we need to take it away from the corrupt ones. Shall we begin?
We shall.What should we do?
Regards, Easwar
Before OOXML gets the formal ISO approval, can one last effort be made to force OOXML to be open without NDA?
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Rony gnulinuxist@gmail.com wrote:
Before OOXML gets the formal ISO approval, can one last effort be made to force OOXML to be open without NDA?
NDA?
Regards, Easwar
On Fri Apr 04, 2008 at 10:37:42PM +0530, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Rony gnulinuxist@gmail.com wrote:
Before OOXML gets the formal ISO approval, can one last effort be made to force OOXML to be open without NDA?
NDA?
Non Disclosure Agreement