Dear ALL & ALmighty List Admin,
The Invitation mail was not intended for the list..
It was just meant for my friends groups...
But the mailing list id was picked up by HI 5 thing
from my address book of Yahoo account...
I think it had sent a mail to everybody on the address
book....
EXTREMELY SORRY FOR THE WHOLE ISSUE !!!
I just got a auto responder mail from RMS too...
GOD knows, how many more people I got to apologize...
Once Again SORRY
Oh yes..........
MY ALMIGHTY LIST ADMIN,
Please FORGIVE ME FOR MY SIN.
If hope Philip S Tellis is the admin....
Regards,
Shailesh
--- Linuxers Admin
<linuxers-admin(a)mm.ilug-bom.org.in> wrote:
> Your hi5 invitation to the list was uncalled for,
> completely off topic.
> You are now on moderation.
>
> --
> List Admin
>
=====
Technology is driving Me CRAZIER ....
But Who said I Want To Be SANE !!!!
Original Author of Signature :Shailesh.S.Mahadik (ssmahadik(a)yahoo.com)
________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your life partner online
Go to: http://yahoo.shaadi.com/india-matrimony
hi!
i'm new here and desperately need freebsd for the amd64 processor .
please help if u can get ur hands to it . will pay for the courier and
the cds
thanks!
Hi,
Any idea how can I protect my LAN against:
Mailware / Spyware
ActiveX and other malicious codes
Virus / worms coming from the HTTP route
It is now getting unbearable.
Thank you.
Vai
I have configured amavis and postfix. But in the virus mails it is ripping
off the sender name. it gives VIRUS
(Worm.Bagle.Gen-zippwd,Worm.Bagle.Gen-zippwd) IN MAIL TO YOU (from
<?(a)mailhost.tifr.res.in>).
Can anybody give me any clue to get the name sender as well.
postfix version 2.1.4-5
amavisd-new version 20030616p10-5
clamav-daemon version 0.80-7
Here is the sample mail.
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:20:00 +0530 (IST)
From: virusalert(a)tifr.res.in
To: santoshk(a)mhtest.tifr.res.in
Subject: VIRUS (Worm.Bagle.Gen-zippwd,
Worm.Bagle.Gen-zippwd) IN MAIL TO YOU (from <?(a)mailhost.tifr.res.in>)
VIRUS ALERT
Our content checker found
viruses: Worm.Bagle.Gen-zippwd, Worm.Bagle.Gen-zippwd
in an email to you from unknown sender:
?(a)mailhost.tifr.res.in
The message has been quarantined as:
/var/lib/amavis/virusmails/virus-20050203-192000-01370-01
Please contact your system administrator for details.
can anybody please help me.
Regards,
Santosh K
Hi,
Some people may recall that I had posted the problem of Gmail not
working with thunderbird on this list. It turns out that the problem is
neither Gmail nor thunderbird. It's MTNL!!
Usually, whenever I used to ping some site, output was something like:
############################################
[/home/soumen] $ ping yahoo.com
PING yahoo.com (66.94.234.13) 56(84) bytes of data.
From 203.94.230.117 icmp_seq=0 Packet filtered
From 203.94.230.117 icmp_seq=1 Packet filtered
From 203.94.230.117 icmp_seq=2 Packet filtered
From 203.94.230.117 icmp_seq=3 Packet filtered
--- yahoo.com ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 received, +4 errors, 100% packet loss, time 3039ms
, pipe 2
[/home/soumen] $
############################################
Yesterday to my surprise I could actually ping to various sites without
the packets getting filtered (I did'nt capture the screen shot but the
"Packet filtered" part was gone & I got some "ttl" & "time" values). On
a hunch, I re-configured my Gmail account & it perfectly worked!!
Today it's again back to "Packet filtered" & Gmail again is not working :(
Is my assumption right that my MTNL dialup is to be blamed? If so, what
I can do to get this fixed? I mean is it possible to actually explain
this to somebody in MTNL & get results? Their helpline is forever busy &
nobody responds to the e-mails (I tried those routes with another problem).
--
Soumen Dass [Registered Linux User # 272639 - Linux nova
2.4.22-1.2115.nptl i686]
Feeling amorous, she looked under the sheets and cried, "Oh, no,
it's Microsoft!"
>The Concept:-
>
>Generally in an office setup, a normal Pentium 400 MHz system with 256 >MB RAM, 100 MHz bus and a 10 GB HDD is sufficient for doing letter >writing, data entry, email, surfing, printing etc. Suppose an office >needs to use 8 computers for 8 operators, with different OSes for >different software or even same OSes, 8 computer systems will need to >be purchased. 8 computer systems will have to be taken for AMCs ( Yeah >! ).
>
>Instead of that if all the hardware requirements are bundled up into one system then that would bring down costs.
>
>The CPU will be 400 MHz X 8 = 3.2 GHz.
>The RAM 256 MB X 8 = 2 GB.
>The BUS speed 100 MHz X 8 = 800 MHZ.
>The HDD 10 GB X 8 = 80 GB
>
>In this way we can get upto 8 different (or even same) OSes running >simultaneously in one system. as the total number of machines is only >one instead of 8. Since the hardware resources are common, a LAN will >not be required to make the 8 computers see each other within the same >system.
Hey Rony !! What I am confused about is : if I have a requirement of 8 different OSes for different types of development work, what good is a single machine to me ? I have 8 people working on 8 different modules.
So a single machine ain't gonna suffice.
The best solution is to have one high-end Server and maybe other diskless nodes.
Otherwise, only one person can utilize the full capacity of 8 OSes running simultaneously.
Please correct me where I have gone wrong in grasping your concept !!
Thanks
Raseel Bhagat
I have a snort (snort2.3) and i need it to forward the
alerts to a syslog server with priority local6
ading alert_syslog: log_local6 log_alert to snort.conf
doesn't work
i even tried the -s option
while i get local syslogs in /var/log messages
i can not get snort to log to some other file or to a
different syslog server
there are no firewall issues and udp port 514 is
reachable
can anybody help me on this one
=====
ninad purohit
ninadonline(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in
have a nice day :-)
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Dear all,
Everybody on this list should go through following link.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/facts/default.mspx
It has whitepapers produced by various companies including microsoft on
differences between Windows and Linux.
Microsoft is saying Windows is more secure than Linux.
Important for SuSe and Red Hat.
-Sachin
Hello,
We are using RedHat Linux AS 3.0 with 400gb of NFS share. I like to have some insight for enabling NFS caching which is by default enabled in Solaris 9.0.
Can I have your valuable suggestions ?
Thanks,
Ravi
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. Learn more.