On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Rony <gnulinuxist(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Ravindra Jaju wrote:
> >
> Instead of dividing or partitioning the group, form your own group as
> per the requirement. Why break someone else's creation.
>
I'd like to point out some examples which support my point.
A school has many grades, and multiple divisions per grade.
As an analogy - not all students use the same classroom.
You might suggest that each thread is a 'virtual classroom' of its
own - but that's not true IMHO. Since it's all mixed, the extra effort it
takes to filter out the interesting from the not-so-interesting (all this
is very subjective - we are not saying these are good and bad
respectively) - makes people really interested in specific causes
lose interest.
Moreover, the list is fairly open - not moderated by draconian
power-clingers.
Many new people keep joining, and not all are well-versed with list
etiquettes and/or the levels are wildly varying.
IMHO, again, I believe a community can thrive when there are clear paths for
people to *grow* systematically along some well-defined paths (rather than
people left fending for themselves) - this is suggestive, and of course
people
are always allowed in an open community to set their own standards and
paths,
and ask for/earn support.
High noise-to-signal ratios can reduce efficiencies and over a period of
time
make people disinterested. I can certainly vouch for the fact that about 8
years
ago, the level on this list was much better than what it has been in the
small
duration now that I've been a part again.
My 2 paise.
Thanks,
jaju