At 12:06 PM +0530 1/5/05, sherlock(a)vsnl.com wrote:
>On Tuesday 04 January 2005 15:09, Rony Bill wrote:
>> On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 11:06, sherlock(a)vsnl.com wrote:
>
>>
>> Dear Jude,
>>
>> We are deviating from the original topic. This is, the ease of
>> installation and setup of M$ compared to Linux.
>
>We are not. The original topic was
>1) is windows popular because it is easy / better / secure yak
>yak to use
>Ans. No windowss not easy,
Although the subject line has now been added to with three magic
words (incl one acronym), I beg to differ: the original topic was the
suggested use of the LUG physical meets to interface with others who
have what I defined was a very real need. Yes, windows is not easy,
but when you are pirating, then if one pirate copy does not work for
whatever reason, then you get another that does. We all have a fairly
clear idea of how this pirate stuff began, but that is water under
the bridge now. Is the legal alternative a practical alternative,
will it maintain or lower the total cost of doing business?
>2) Is it ok to use pirate software particularly by small bussinesses
>Ans. It is not and not just because u have a completely superior,
>orders of magnitude cheaper completely legal alternative.
And here you have an opportunity, with the small businessperson
coming forward to you, asking for help to get out of this
uncomfortable situation.
>3) Random points about providing service without ability to do so
>Ans. Dont do ANYTHING without ability particularly when u charge
>for the thing.
But who is charging? Does anyone here think that the local service
levels for any flavours of GNU/Linux OSes is satisfactory? (I don't
include so-called Enterprise systems, because that is not aimed at
this target group in the first place). I am suggesting this as one
step for creating another layer of small businesspeople, those who
can add value to the small businesspeople set of entrepreneurs
(without, as someone caustically suggested a couple of days back,
becoming super-techies themselves). Surely some people on this list
are confident enough of their skills? Does everyone need to rise up
to their level, even when that is not their main thing in life?
>) Stupid attempts to paper over piracy for personal gain
>Ans. Rebuttal of this and to show that the pirate needs no mercy
>at all.
What do you call personal gain? There must be some very rich
cybercafe owners out there, but we aren't talking about them. We are
talking about small businesspeople. They don't make a lot of money,
they don't have a lot of money. But they will pay some real money to
minimise the real costs they have to bear for being in business.
>5) Simplistic and totally wrong inference about kernel, distro,
>hardware, drivers, and applications.
>Ans: get informed before diving into the deep end. The rebuttal
>requires the reader have basic understanding of these issues.
>
>And finally why am i flogging this topic so much.
>Ans. because u and many others shifting from windows to GNU/linux
>just dont seem to understand the difference between fact and your
>version of it. Nor do you realise that u are doing nobody a favour
>in switching over to GNU/linux. And that lack of knowledge and
>skill can be easily corrected with only a little effort. And if u
>are doing bussiness the rules changed a few yrs ago.
I think some of you may have read Ashish Saboo's mail a few days
back. I don't think that his attempt to pull together a coalition of
small businesspeople needed such a supercilious set of responses.
Either everyone on this list has got some good well-paying secure
jobs, or you have all forgotten what it takes to run a business in
India from scratch.
Although the history of cybercafes is quite recent (I believe they
just celebrated the decade anniversary of the first one, in London),
there are quite a few people who think that this innovation is at
least as powerful and potentially far more powerful than the PCO. I
am one of them, as you may have guessed.
I see absolutely no reason that a business based on fairly
inexpensive consumer devices should require a PhD in computer science
at the entry level - and given a working life of three to four years
for the average small businessperson - certainly there is no reason
for the vast majority of them to acquire such indepth tech knowledge
- unless the fundas of the business are genuinely too complex.
Goodbye ICT, in that case, but maybe none of you here are interested
in what that is.
It irks me no end to read about the ham-handed way our government
(both state and central) goes about frequently changing the rules of
the game for cybercafe owners (for all users of ICT actually, but the
main bloc of commercial users are cybercafes). Against such
inevitable and wayward externalities, one simple solution is for
persons with a little more tech knowledge to band together to offer -
for a fee, no-one is suggesting anything else.
What will the fees be, who will charge them, what is the service
offering - are you waiting for NASSCOM or IMC or the Mumbai Police to
define this for you, or are you willing to come together and work
with a group of these small businesspeople - for all you know, some
are your neighbours - and work this out for yourself? If not at a
LUG, maybe this isn't the best time and place, then the alternative
already suggested is CDAC at Nariman Point, on a suitable day.
And if this list isn't a suitable place to discuss the real world,
then perhaps anyone who does volunteer a little time and effort to
kick this off can put together a different list where the right
solution can emerge.
--
Vickram