At 06:28 even 9/4/02 +0530, Philip wrote:
>On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Q u a s i wrote:
> > I dont need some site telling me which is better - I *use* IE6 and Mozilla
> > 1.0 - Mozilla is good. Especially Galeon is very fast under Gnome (as it
>
>I think what he meant was that IE cannot display all the features of style
>sheets because it doesn't support them. IE is not a standards compliant
>browser, although IE6 is probably the closest that they've come.
I had got that. But my *whole* argument was from the user point
of view. Not the technical. Mozilla may be superior to IE in design,
architecture etc. - but IE is faster/cleaner to use. Have Netscape/Mozilla
*always* been 100% compliant?
My webpage, which I handcoded in HTML looked bad in Netscape 4.?,
It looked better in Mozilla, but much better in IE5+. I have used png,
jpeg, CSS2.0 & plain HTML only.
On my X, Mozilla takes 10-15 seconds to start. Galeon takes
4-7. On my windows Netscape 6 took ~20 sec to load. Mozilla 6-10. IE
takes ~1 sec. It is not that I need IE, when in Linux I prefer Links.
But of course it is pointless.
quasi
p.s.
I think with this mail I will retire from this thread. Throwing about
our-own chests in front of each other is not the Linux way, at least not
for me. I have peace, in that I have converted a sufficiently large number
of people to the GNU/Linux way.