On 11/25/2011 11:02 PM, jtd@mtnl.net.in wrote:
On Friday 25 November 2011 22:32:29 Rony wrote:
Every system has its risks and chances of cheating but we have to select the one that has the minimum chances of it and benefits are maximum. Electronic meters can be tampered with but they are still welcome. Wireless communication can be compromised but we cannot do without it.
EXACTLY. This one is the opposite of what you say after spending 150000 Cr. You read that right 15 with 4 zeros. And twists the entire concept of a democratic system. The UK scrapped an exact same system as the risks were too high and benefits non existent.
No one is denying the need for proper planning and trial runs before actually implementing the system.