On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 20:57, Sriram N wrote:
--- "Nadeem M. Khan" nadeem.m.khan@gmail.com wrote:
I second that. You've hit the nail on the head! I couldn't agree with you more. Visual this and Visual that cannot be considered "languages", atleast IMHO.
As a popular quote goes, I'd crawl over an acre of 'Visual This++' and 'Integrated Development That' to get to gcc, Emacs, Vi and Perl. Thank you.
Nothing thrills me more than writing pure, clean code on a black and white console.
With no offense intended
None taken.
(and without any intention to trigger an IDE war): I wonder if you've worked with Object Oriented platforms such as Java or C++ where one has to work with thousands of classes.
Umm..no. I not a cpp or java junkie yet. I'm just out of college and am dabbling in C, shell scripting and Perl. Maybe my point of view would change once I venture into OOP.
BTW, could anyone suggest a nice book for GTK programming with C? I'm fascinated by GUI applications like Gyach which are written in C/GTK and would love to develop something like that.
Regards, NMK. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- To segfault is human; to bluescreen moronic.