On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 01:54:03 +0530, Dinesh Joshi dinesh.a.joshi@gmail.com said:
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 13:43 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 00:47:02 +0530, Dinesh Joshi dinesh.a.joshi@XXXXXXXXXXX said: What is broken in my mailer?
Do you see my mail client quoting your email address in this public-mailing-list-which-gets-published-all-over-the-internet?
Yup. That is not broken behaviour; it is creating an attribution exactly as it was designed to do.
I did read the part where you tried to explain how your insults were all a joke, tee-hee. I found it less than compelling.
Whatever...you're being an idiot if you think i insulted
^^^^^
anything. As I said earlier I wont be explaining.
Nice.
I have no idea who thought of Linux, and the brethren free BSD based UNIX operating systems as a Toy. The circles I move in, the phrase is used to describe Windows, and not UNIX and clones.
Uh....you're kidding, right? Ever heard of Steve Ballmer? Bill Gates? Hello??? Microsoft? Rest of the world?
So they think UNIX, which they tried so hard to copy, is a Toy? And while they might be entitled to their opinion, and think Linux is a Toy, I, and the people I work/play with, continue to think their efforts created a Toy OS that shall never come close to our work spaces.
I suppose I must be one of those who has a poor understanding of Linux and operating systems in general. I am looking forward to being enlightened.
I have better things to do :)
A pity. I could have learned so so very much.
manoj