On 28-Mar-07, at 1:16 PM, Laxminarayan G Kamath A wrote:
- If it is using free software, no license need be produced.
And surely we will have to define what free means .. :-)
I guess in the document we need to make it mandatory to mention what type of "free (as defined by fsf.org or gnu.org)" or "free (as in gratis)"
cops dont understand definitions. A list of linux distros need to be given. And a list of commonly used software should also be given - such software should require a license. Example of the list would be:
Microsoft windows - various versions coreldraw pagemaker photoshop RHEL
under distros that dont require license
fedora mandriva slackware debian gnewsense freebsd openbsd
etc etc