30 Mar
2009
30 Mar
'09
4:20 p.m.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:44 PM, scrapo <scrapo(a)saswatabanerjee.com> wrote:
Dinesh A. Joshi wrote:
On the same front, i have consulted a lawyer, and according to him, it
amounts to unfair trade practice, via false advertising. they can be
take up in the consumer court and will have their knuckles rapped.
Now the question is, who is the brave soul who can take both tata and
reliance into court and survive.....
Information Security wrote:
Actually, I find it funny that you guys are ok with a "fair use cap"
which in effect makes it a 10gb data limit connection while being called
an unlimited connection. What it amounts to is false advertising.
MTNL is much better, it does not call it an unlimited plan but says its
a limited data plan.
it seems to be good option but really expensive
compared to people who
would go on downloading there mails as i think 10gb fair usage policy
cap is just not good it should be more than 25 gb per month
250 - 500GB cap seems to be fair. Not 25 or 10GB. ( per month )
- Dinesh
Regards
saswata
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers