scrapo wrote:
Nopes, you are wrong. The table clearly says Usage
Unlimited. In other
plans, there is usage limit specified in GB. So where it says unlimited,
it means that there is no limit on data usage. They can not claim it was
meant for time.
Unmetered, Unlimited, Flat rate. The terminology is clearly there. I get
your point and I'm not opposing it. TRAI or whoever is incharge must
make sure the *correct* terminology is used while describing the plans.
There is a *** marked against it and the cap is
mentioned, but it still
amounts to false advertising and MRTP or TRAI can pull up the company on
this matter.
It has been declared earlier by MRTP in cases that you can not have a
misleading headline and expect people to read the fine print, specially
in case of passing advts - eg hoarding, etc. A good lawyer will get the
judge to tear the company.
Lets do it then! :) Why hasn't anybody taken up Reliance to task for this?
Its a business decision of each company what they will
charge, as long
as they are communicating it clearly to the consumer.
You can however, make a complaint under MRTP to the competition
commission if you can show there is cartelling or if 1 company who has
Why doesn't anybody do this if they feel so strongly about it?
the bandwidth is preventing others from using it. TRAI
rules also have
similar clauses, I think its under ISP-II status (meant for
infrasturcture provider, not the traditional ISP). I remember reading
it. In fact, I also remember there is a case being investigated on the
same matter between reliance and WEMESEA 2 on being denied additional
landing station rights by Tatas.
I think it was VSNL which was bought up by TATAs
and same thing for BSNL.
Well, all my clients got their leased line trariffs
cut massively after
that and it has not gone up since. A local leased line (short distance)
from Kanjur to Lower Parel now cost us less than 5K per month for a
2mbps connection. It used to be more than 25K per month. 64K used to
cost 10K per month.
Yeah so? What did it mean for *us* retail consumers? It meant
lower
costs. We never got any! :(
- Dinesh