Hello friends,
I am a IT businessman since 1997, after my graduation, I am heading a software and IT services company in Singapore. I do several freelance, projects on emerging technologies. I assit, budding business, IT, and now Linux professionals to start business in Singapore and California. I have a strong presence in these two cities for nearly 8 years. I represent several IT and Business consulting firms as Senior Consultant and Project lead and help them seek GRANTS, INVESTMENTS, JOBS, from several government agencies (in Singapore government support to local and foreign talents are quite straight forward and easy) and other sectors both in Singapore and United States.
I wish to start (infact started) a Linux Solutions and Consultancy division within my existing framework in the US and Singapore, (We all can explore the structure, product and services related to the business anlayzing the strength & weeknesses) I can organize funding locally but looking for young, innovative talents, domain experts to shake hands (as I am not a TOTAL linux guru) we can design, develop and create a huge academy down the line (I am fairly a successful IT technopreneur & business man in my Career in this last 8 years). I wish to discuss this with individuals who are interested to have a one to one chat to take this project forward.
Candidates looking for a JOB can work for your own company in US / Singapore. Work VISA, Company, Start up capital, connections and network is available abundant except talents in this field. Interested friends, feel free to contact me at linuxeffort@yahoo.com (Open for any age group). As an Indian, I normally help my fellow citizens worldwide as much as I can. Note: Please send your personal email address while your communicate back to me.
Dear Friends, I live in Singapore, I am silent member of this group, If anyone is interested in any of the opportunities explained, we can meet in SG and discuss the possible happenings in the industry and I can open opputunities for budding technoprenuers from India. Regards, Albert H
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
I just came across this online article, about a report by CCIA, a body promoting the use of open (not open-source) systems and networks: http://dc.internet.com/news/article.php/3083121
Clinton Goveas http://www.clintongoveas.com
------- Open Source Knowledge Base - http://os.clintongoveas.com Securely Distribute Your e-Products - http://ods.clintongoveas.com
Hi all,
I need some help from you guys. What I want to do is redirect the streams. For eg. Suppose we give ls > /dev/null, it redirects the STDOUT to /dev/null, but the STDERR remains to be console. Suppose I have a program which prints numbers from 1 to 999999 on STDOUT and a random string on STDERR for each corresponding number in STDOUT. Now let that program be called myprog. I run it in the background on the shell prompt. # myprog & 1 sdfsf 2 sdsdf ..... 7563 ...
Now, I want to redirect the STDOUT and STDERR of the running background process to some files , say r1.txt or r2.txt without stopping or affecting the process.
Inshort, the streams should be redirected at runtime. Please help me out... any trick or utility program or anything that I can do for it is welcome.
Thanx in advance.
Akhilesh.
-- ********************************************************** * Never say die unless you are dead ! * * .oooO * * ( ) Oooo. Only those who will risk going too far * * \ ( ( ) Can possibly find out how far one can go!* * _) ) / * * (_/ http://www.it.iitb.ac.in/~akhilesh/ * **********************************************************
Akhilesh Suresh Shirbhate akhilesh@it.iitb.ac.in said:
Now, I want to redirect the STDOUT and STDERR of the running background process to some files , say r1.txt or r2.txt without stopping or affecting the process.
Places to look at Bash Programming Howto - http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Bash-Prog-Intro- HOWTO.html#toc3
Advanced Bash Scripting Guide - http://www.tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/io- redirection.html
You should be able to take it forward from there :)
prgname 1>stdout.txt 2>stderr.txt
All these solutions are for the time before starting the program execution. I got two suggestions: 1. Use calls like dup and dup2 2. Use things like ./prog >r1.txt 2>r2.txt
But for using the first solution, I need to modify program source which I dont have. The second solution is worthwhile only before I start the program. But what I need to do is readjust streams at runtime. For eg., suppose a program is running and I see some interesting output on some screen. I want to redirect it to a file now... How do I do that, without stopping the process !
Now, I want to redirect the STDOUT and STDERR of the running background process to some files , say r1.txt r r2.txt without stopping or affecting the process.
You can do the following: ./prog >r1.txt 2>r2.txt &
-- ********************************************************** * Never say die unless you are dead ! * * .oooO * * ( ) Oooo. Only those who will risk going too far * * \ ( ( ) Can possibly find out how far one can go!* * _) ) / * * (_/ http://www.it.iitb.ac.in/~akhilesh/ * **********************************************************
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:14:48PM +0530, Akhilesh Suresh Shirbhate wrote:
The second solution is worthwhile only before I start the program. But what I need to do is readjust streams at runtime. For eg., suppose a program is running and I see some interesting output on some screen. I want to redirect it to a file now... How do I do that, without stopping the process !
DISCLAIMER: I don't really know what your intention is. Moreover, I have never done this, but I _think_ it could work ...
Basically, what you want to do is go and control the specific streams attached to a running process. I don't know how to do that, but there's another way, by building a wrapper around this program.
This wrapper could be a simple perl script or maybe a C program. It should call the original program, and take control of its stderr and stdout, and connect them to its own stderr and stdout in the default state. Additionally, it should keep scanning for SIGNALs from you. Now map different functions to different SIGNALs, which will redirect the original programs strings to wherever you want ...
Sameer.
Hi all,
Suppose I am working on machine A. I have a X running on A. I open a gui program like gvim on A. I started doing some work in gvim. I keep it open and now I move physically to machine B. I also have an X running on B. Now, I want to import the gvim window in which I was working to machine B's display. I want to do it without losing the state of gvim window (i.e whatever I typed there on A.) How do I do it ? Thanx in advance.
Regards, Akhilesh.
-- ********************************************************** * Never say die unless you are dead ! * * .oooO * * ( ) Oooo. Only those who will risk going too far * * \ ( ( ) Can possibly find out how far one can go!* * _) ) / * * (_/ http://www.it.iitb.ac.in/~akhilesh/ * **********************************************************
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 05:07:22PM +0530, Akhilesh Suresh Shirbhate wrote:
B's display. I want to do it without losing the state of gvim window (i.e whatever I typed there on A.) How do I do it ?
AFAIK, that's not possible without a drastic re-implementation of the X server as well as gvim. You might be able to get the window on machine B, in principle. But how do you migrate the state of gvim itself? The contents of the buffer, for example, are completely unaware of X and vice versa.
Sameer.
Hi all, Are there any projects going on where the system uses some fundae as mentioned by SameerDS (which talks of rewrite of X) ? And I feel that the X server just does the task of rendering the application... The buffer and all are maintained at the application level ? I am not very well aware of the X Windows specification, but I think that the X server just renders the windows and handles the windowing event.. That means that GUI level state maintainance is the thing done by X server and any place where the state is maintained, it is maintained in a well defined format with fixed state variables. Is there any mechanism which allows us to export this state to some other X server which will later rerenders the state (GUI) on that X server terminal ? Sorry if I am doing some big "gooch" in the understanding of the whole system ? Also, if someone knows a small,brisk, detailed document which explained the working of X windows system from head-to-toe without getting into the messy X Windows system specification, please post the link !
Thanx in advance.
Akhi.
PS: I am not removing the following reply as it is relevant and imp to understand the above problem.
B's display. I want to do it without losing the state of gvim window (i.e whatever I typed there on A.) How do I do it ?
AFAIK, that's not possible without a drastic re-implementation of the X server as well as gvim. You might be able to get the window on machine B, in principle. But how do you migrate the state of gvim itself? The contents of the buffer, for example, are completely unaware of X and vice versa.
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Sameer D. Sahasrabuddhe wrote:
~ On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 05:07:22PM +0530, Akhilesh Suresh Shirbhate wrote: ~ ~ > B's display. I want to do it without losing the state of gvim window ~ > (i.e whatever I typed there on A.) How do I do it ? ~ ~ AFAIK, that's not possible without a drastic re-implementation of the ~ X server as well as gvim. You might be able to get the window on ~ machine B, in principle. But how do you migrate the state of gvim ~ itself? The contents of the buffer, for example, are completely ~ unaware of X and vice versa.
The closest Akhilesh can get is VNC I guess. Mandrake in perticular has great support for it, you can export the currect session using VNC, which I have not yet figured out how to do in SuSE for example [KDE's krfb sucks as it only allows to connect to your desktop within an hour of creating an invitation; is there any Gnome counterpart? Though KDE's Remote Desktop Connection Client is completely awesome!]
Mandrake is supposed to be the easiest distro for newbies, with URPMI matching apt from Debian with some very nice repositories. I am surprised people here dont use it much. Unlike SuSE and probably Redhat its completely GPL too.
[root@10 upadhyay]# urpmi --wget kile ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/contrib/texstar/mandrake/9.1/rpms/kile-1.4-3tex.i586.rpm installing /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/kile-1.4-3tex.i586.rpm Preparing... ################################################## 1:kile ################################################## [root@10 upadhyay]#
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Akhilesh Suresh Shirbhate wrote:
~ please post the link !
http://freedesktop.org/~jg/roadmap.html Where they are and where they want to be.
-
Akhilesh Suresh Shirbhate -
Albert Henriques -
Amit Upadhyay -
Clinton Goveas -
Sachin Rase -
Sameer D. Sahasrabuddhe -
Sthitaprajna -
Vinodkumar Nair