>> RMS was NEVER associated with the Open Source movement. He is the
>> founder of the free software movement, the GNU Project and the Free
>> Software Foundation, and none of these are part of the Open Source
>> movement. Atleast not according to RMS. (And I am a RMS fan.)
>>
> Think OpenSource and GNU without Linux.
> Don't separate the things - Why one should envy or be jelous to any of
> our community? And by hating each other - only M$ is gaining and
> laughing at us. I am wondering why people starting GNOME v/s KDE and
> Linux v/s GNU/Linux wars?
Stating the fact that RMS was NOT a part of the Open Source movement
does not convey any hatred towards anybody. It just clears some
misinformation. In the same way that, if I said I am not part of the
Indian cricket team I would not convey any hatred towards Indian
cricket. :D
Being a member of a GLUG (there IS a difference between a LUG and a
GLUG, however subtle that maybe), we are expected to be aware of the
differences between these various entities and terms. Otherwise how
are we going to spread awareness about GNU/Linux.
I found many of my fellow members refer to "the GNU utilities being
used by Linux". Well that is again a mistake. Linux is the kernel
which is a part of the whole operating system, which the GNU project,
sponsored by the FSF started. There are other GNU based systems that
use other kernels. eg., GNU/Hurd. Yeah it is true Hurd is still far
from being complete, but that is again another matter.
It is not a matter of a GNU/Linux vs. Linux warfare, it is just about
getting the record straight. Linus Torvalds should get full credit for
developing such a wonderful monolithic kernel, and releasing it under
the GNU GPL. Similarly RMS should be credited with spearheading other
components of the system. Namely the compiler (GCC), a text editor
(GNU Emacs), the debugger (GDB), the shell (GNU Bash), a desktop
environment (GNOME), the bootloader (GRUB) and so on. These are very
important parts of the system without which Linux would not have been
able to survive. The other way round is true also. So honestly there
is no scope for flame wars, as long we give credit where it is due.
Regards,
Debarshi