>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: jtd <jtd(a)mtnl.net.in>
> To: "GNU/Linux Users Group, Mumbai, India" <linuxers(a)mm.glug-bom.org>
> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:09:07 +0530
> Subject: Re: [ILUG-BOM] [Cross Posting] How the corrupt ones manipulate
> things - are we going to allow them to win ? Should we just keep quiet or
> begin a global protest ?
> On Saturday 29 March 2008 10:53 am, Sudhir Gandotra wrote:
>
> > The statement goes on to say that Danish Standards is changing its
> > vote because "the 168 Danish comments have been adopted as changes
> > to ISO/IEC DIS 29500 OOXML".
>
> What they did not tell you is that abstain = yes. And that email votes
> count. Only that many of the abstainers never recieved any intimation
> stating that abstain = yes.
>
> So in the bizzare M$ universe no with comments become yes, if the ecma
> makes a comment - any comment - on your comment and abstain = yes and
> you can change a no to yes BUT you turncoats cant change a yes to no.
>
> Get it. NO? aha that's what happens if you dont use M$.
>
The standard operating process of Microsoft has been:
a) Stuff the committee with supporters (as happened in Pakistan and other
countries)
b) If that doesn't work and the committee says NO to OOXML then
c) Complain to the ministries under which the committee works, threaten
to withdraw investment, get proxies to file complaints etc.
In India, I hear that they raised the issue with the Prime Minister's Office
and the PM called for a meeting on this issue on Thursday. Apparently, the
head of one of the software export houses (a VERY respected person) also
sent a fax supporting OOXML *after* the committee had given its decision,
trying to overturn India's NO vote. Someone should ask whether these
companies represent India's interests on the BIS committee or are they
protecting their dollar revenues?
Venky