21 Feb
2006
21 Feb
'06
2:26 p.m.
*Minutes of February GLUG-Meet @ HBCSE*
The GNU/Linux Users Group of Mumbai held its February GLUG meet on
19th February 2006 at HBCSE, Mankhurd. Meet was attended by about 25
people coming from all over the city. This meet consisted more of
technical sessions with handson demonstrations.
Following talks were held.
* Backup and restoring
We started with a talk about backup and restore of data. We saw the
demonstration on how one can use the utilities like tar/cp/rsync to
create incremental/differential backups.
* Professional Certifications - By Mr. Shankar Iyer (RedHat)
Shankar talked about the value of professional certifications in
today's scenario, and the various certifications available from RedHat
for upcoming professionals.
--- tea break :-)
* LaTeX document preparation system - By Ms. Meena (HBCSE)
Meena talked about the oldest and best document preparations system
availabe, LaTeX. Starting with few simple examples demonstrating the
basic text formatting capabilities of LaTeX, we moved on to see how
good LaTeX is at rendering mathematical equations, creating books,
thesis, letters etc.
LaTeX sources of examples covered in the talk are available here:
http://db.ilug-bom.org.in/lug-meetings/Feb-2006/latex-examples.tar.gz
----
*Details of next GLUG meet*
Date: To be decided
-> Agenda : Talk on Qt/KDE development
-> Location: To be decided
* Pictures:
Pictures taken in this meet have been posted on ILUG-BOM picture
gallery ``http://db.ilug-bom.org.in/pics/''.
Anurag
--
__ __
gnu /noo/ n. Ox like antelope; (abbr.) /gnoo/ n.
(recursive acronym) Gnu's Not Unix.
21 Feb
21 Feb
8:37 p.m.
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 08:56, Anurag wrote:
*snip*
*Details of next GLUG meet*
Date: To be decided
-> Agenda : Talk on Qt/KDE development
-> Location: To be decided
* Pictures:
Pictures taken in this meet have been posted on ILUG-BOM picture
gallery ``http://db.ilug-bom.org.in/pics/''.
A good meet indeed. Must complement Ms.Meena once more for the
informative presentation / hands on demo of LaTeX.
I have one suggestion. Next time please enable red-eye correction on the
digicam. There are too many red eyes in those photographs :)
--
Dinesh A. Joshi
7:02 p.m.
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 08:56, Anurag wrote:
*snip*
> * Pictures:
> Pictures taken in this meet have been posted on ILUG-BOM picture
> gallery ``http://db.ilug-bom.org.in/pics/''.
So I am pretty sure that the gentleman in this picture in the first
row, second from left is JTD. true? false? :)
http://db.ilug-bom.org.in/pics/main.php?g2_view=core:ShowItem&g2_itemId…
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
7:33 p.m.
On 2/21/06, Abhishek Daga <abhishekdaga(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
So I am pretty sure that the gentleman in this picture
in the first
row, second from left is JTD. true? false? :)
http://db.ilug-bom.org.in/pics/main.php?g2_view=core:ShowItem&g2_itemId…
Nope.
First row first is Pradeepto, third is Dinesh Shah and the fourth is
Nagarjuna G.
--> Vinayak H
22 Feb
22 Feb
10:38 a.m.
Vinayak Hegde wrote:
Nope. First row first is Pradeepto, third is Dinesh Shah and the
fourth is Nagarjuna G.
If anyone is clicking pics for a personal album, its ok but I strongly
believe in seeking permission from the persons in the pics, if the pics
are to be posted on a public bulletin board like the internet. Otherwise
let there be a clear policy stating that those who attend the meets will
be photographed and the pics will be posted on the net. Then let the
members choose to attend or not.
Regards,
Rony.
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
2:14 p.m.
Sometime Today, RB cobbled together some glyphs to say:
pics are to be posted on a public bulletin board like
the internet.
Otherwise let there be a clear policy stating that those who attend
the meets will be photographed and the pics will be posted on the net.
It's always been an unstated understanding that pics will be taken at
the meet and posted on the ilug-bom server. If one does not want to be
in those pics, one may refrain from posing, or better still, take the
photo so that the guy who's taking the photo doesn't get left out.
--
"He's a man of few words, and he doesn't know what either of them
mean,"
people said, but not when he was within hearing.
(The Carpet People)
6:59 p.m.
Philip Tellis wrote:
It's always been an unstated understanding that
pics will be taken at
the meet and posted on the ilug-bom server. If one does not want to
be in those pics, one may refrain from posing, or better still, take
the photo so that the guy who's taking the photo doesn't get left
out.
I don't mind clicking the photos. But those who click photos do it
before any member gets a chance to excuse himself, while the meet or
some discussion is going on. It should be a matter
of choice especially when it involves posting the pics on the internet
and this unsaid rule should be adhered to by all. It is better
if all those who click photos do it with the consent of those being
clicked.
Regards,
Rony.
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Photos � NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a photo
http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
23 Feb
23 Feb
6:29 p.m.
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 10:38 +0530, Rony Bill wrote:
Vinayak Hegde wrote:
Whoa!
Nope. First row first is Pradeepto, third is Dinesh Shah and the
fourth is Nagarjuna G.
If anyone is clicking pics for a personal album, its ok but I strongly
believe in seeking permission from the persons in the pics, if the pics
are to be posted on a public bulletin board like the internet. Otherwise
let there be a clear policy stating that those who attend the meets will
be photographed and the pics will be posted on the net. Then let the
members choose to attend or not.
Legally speaking, if pics are taken in a public setting the subject
cannot reserve the right of how, when and where they'll be published.
He/she has "no say" whatsoever.
Regards,
ah
24 Feb
24 Feb
6:04 p.m.
Amol Hatwar wrote:
Legally speaking, if pics are taken in a public
setting the subject
cannot reserve the right of how, when and where they'll be published.
He/she has "no say" whatsoever.
Then the best option would be to avoid linux meets.
Regards,
Rony.
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
8:18 p.m.
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 18:04 +0530, Rony Bill wrote:
Amol Hatwar wrote:
Rony, you would have to avoid all _public_ meetings/conferences/summits
etc., not just Linux meets. In all such events that I have attended (I
am sure others will agree) pictures are taken of those on the stage as
well as in the audience - without exception. BTW, even for private
parties people actually pay the "paparazzi" to get their pics in the
papers (like Page 3 in the local rags) :()
--
Arun Khan
Linux is like a wigwam - no gates, no windows, apache inside
Legally speaking, if pics are taken in a public
setting the subject
cannot reserve the right of how, when and where they'll be published.
He/she has "no say" whatsoever.
Then the best option would be to avoid linux meets. 
10:57 p.m.
Rony, you would have to avoid all _public_
meetings/conferences/summits
etc., not just Linux meets. In all such events that I have attended (I
am sure others will agree) pictures are taken of those on the stage as
well as in the audience - without exception. BTW, even for private
parties people actually pay the "paparazzi" to get their pics in the
papers (like Page 3 in the local rags) :()
Well, I think we have to modify our list joining policies here :)
More over this issue has dragged on too much, dont you think guys, lets
put an end to this topic for good.
Thanks & Regards,
Mitul Limbani,
Founder & CEO,
Enterux Solutions,
The Enterprise Linux Company (TM),
www.enterux.com
10:45 p.m.
Sometime Today, ML cobbled together some glyphs to say:
More over this issue has dragged on too much, dont you
think guys,
lets put an end to this topic for good.
no, it's fine. there's no harm in discussing various freedoms like the
freedom of the press and the right to privacy.
--
I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth.
-- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3198.9
25 Feb
25 Feb
4:59 a.m.
On Friday 24 February 2006 17:15, Philip Tellis wrote:
no, it's fine. there's no harm in discussing
various freedoms like
the freedom of the press and the right to privacy.
Don't forget the constitution of India and several hundred other
countries out there :)
--
Dinesh A. Joshi
4:34 p.m.
--- Dinesh Joshi <dinesh.a.joshi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday 24 February 2006 17:15, Philip Tellis
wrote:
> no, it's fine. there's no harm in discussing various freedoms like
> the freedom of the press and the right to privacy.
since we wanted the
discussion...
"Freedom of the press" is not a blanket fundamental right. Infact it is
not even an explicit fundamental right. It is derived from the "right
to freedom" fundamental right stated in article 19.
However, by virtue of legal precedence the press does enjoy a great
deal of freedom.
Right to privacy : not explcitly mentioned in the constitution. once
again legal precedence dictates this very important piece that should
have been legislated properly.
While its good to have an active judiciary, these rights should be
engraved in the constitution and not based on judicial precedents.
Their is a risk of overturning those as we see in the case of roe v/s
wade which has the potential of being raked up after so many years.
Don't forget the constitution of India and several hundred other
countries out there :)
It is actually a very non trivial discussion given the nature of
communication these days and in the days to come.
-abhi
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
6:14 p.m.
On Saturday 25 February 2006 4:34 pm, Abhishek Daga wrote:
--- Dinesh Joshi <dinesh.a.joshi(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On Friday 24 February 2006 17:15, Philip Tellis
wrote:
> no, it's fine. there's no harm in discussing various freedoms
> like the freedom of the press and the right to privacy.
since we wanted the discussion...
Right to privacy : not explcitly mentioned in the
constitution.
once again legal precedence dictates this very important piece that
should have been legislated properly.
Publishing a few pics of someone in a public place is not a violation.
But publishing a series of photos of someone in various public places
in order to build up a fake story is definetly a violation.
The nature of technology will not change this. If one gets
Kareenaesque in public one should expect the publicity.
Curtailing the press to prevent such things is definetly a violation
of freedom of the press and public. Of course i can't understand
what's so interesting about watching some 2pence celebrity screwing
themselves.
--
rgds
jtd
6:46 p.m.
--- JTD <jtd(a)mtnl.net.in> wrote:
<snip>
Publishing a few pics of someone in a public place is
not a
violation.
But publishing a series of photos of someone in various public places
in order to build up a fake story is definetly a violation.
<snip>
Assuming that the act was committed in a public place. Is a pub a
public place? I am asking. I dont know whats the technicality here.
Does "right to admission reserved" make it a private place where right
to privacy takes precedence over right to freedom of expression?
Of course i can't understand
what's so interesting about watching some 2pence celebrity screwing
themselves.
Lets see now,
Cheap Thrills,
Voyeurism,
Cheap Thrills.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
7:34 p.m.
On Saturday 25 February 2006 6:46 pm, Abhishek Daga wrote:
It does become a private place. And such establishments will tell you
"no photos". Which is kinda defeating cause every reporter worth his
r will be diving in with cameras.
If some story that has public interest (basically acts that usurp the
commons, acts leading to violation of the law / other's rights) was
published with photos from even a private area I think it would be
fully justified. We do have many such definitions where photography
is restricted due to "security" and "public interest". Our railway
stations and airports for example. Never mind that you could walk in
from jari mari or fire a missile from the slums surrounding it.
On a side note my cousin was shooting with a camcorder recently at
Matheran. Some girls were walking around. One of them jumped up and
started creating a ruckus. My cousin refused to erase his recording
and told them to get out of public places if they dont want to be
photographed. In any case he added he preferred the monkeys they look
good in comparison.
--
rgds
jtd
--- JTD <jtd(a)mtnl.net.in> wrote:
<snip>
But publishing
a series of photos of someone in various public
places in order to build up a fake story is definetly a
violation.
<snip>
Assuming that the act was committed in a public place. Is a pub a
public place? I am asking. I dont know whats the technicality here.
Does "right to admission reserved" make it a private place where
right to privacy takes precedence over right to freedom of
expression?
9:17 p.m.
JTD wrote:
On a side note my cousin was shooting with a camcorder
recently at
Matheran. Some girls were walking around. One of them jumped up and
started creating a ruckus. My cousin refused to erase his recording
and told them to get out of public places if they dont want to be
photographed. In any case he added he preferred the monkeys they look
good in comparison.
We are going off track. The discussion is about our meets and respecting
an individual's choice to not have his picture posted on the internet.
Regards,
Rony.
___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security
Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
10:36 p.m.
--- Rony Bill <ronbillypop(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Net laws havent come from outer space (no pun intended). They are a
logical evolution of existing "Real world" laws.
The example is actually a pretty good one. Colleges, if aided by the
state are then public places. Anything subsidized by the state is a
public place therefore by visiting such a place you have waived off
your right to privacy.
And if you sue anyone for taking such pics and posting on the net, then
the judge/tribunal will wonder WTF were you doing saying cheese/mayo to
the camera....
Also, if i am not mistaken, by law, all photographs are copyright of
the photographer (unless explicitly waived) even if you pay them to
take the pic.
Putting it all together, you never really had a right to start with.
neither of privacy nor to the photo.
-abhi
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
.... and told
them to get out of public places if they dont want to
be photographed.
We are going off track. The discussion is about our meets and
respecting an individual's choice to not have his picture posted on
the internet.
Regards,
Rony.
26 Feb
26 Feb
4:39 a.m.
Dont read this. It's rather long and boring (no offense meant).
On Saturday 25 February 2006 17:06, Abhishek Daga wrote:
Net laws havent come from outer space (no pun
intended). They are a
logical evolution of existing "Real world" laws.
The example is actually a pretty good one. Colleges, if aided by the
state are then public places. Anything subsidized by the state is a
public place therefore by visiting such a place you have waived off
your right to privacy.
And if you sue anyone for taking such pics and posting on the net,
then the judge/tribunal will wonder WTF were you doing saying
cheese/mayo to the camera....
Also, if i am not mistaken, by law, all photographs are copyright of
the photographer (unless explicitly waived) even if you pay them to
take the pic.
Putting it all together, you never really had a right to start with.
neither of privacy nor to the photo.
-abhi
What he means is, if you dont want to be photographed then stay inside
your house, close all doors, windows, blinds. And don't directly
interact with the outside world. :)
--
Dinesh A. Joshi
25 Feb
25 Feb
11:42 p.m.
--- Dinesh Joshi <dinesh.a.joshi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Dont read this. It's rather long and boring (no
offense meant).
What he means is, if you dont want to be photographed then stay
inside
your house, close all doors, windows, blinds. And don't directly
interact with the outside world. :)
Yours is not just to do and die,
but to also question how and why..
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
12:43 p.m.
Dinesh Joshi wrote:
What he means is, if you dont want to be photographed then stay
inside your house, close all doors, windows, blinds. And don't
directly interact with the outside world. :)
Is it so difficult for us to simply excuse an attendee member from being
photographed? We are putting up big theories and laws on privacy as if
we are legal experts even using curses like WTF... ( as Abhi put it)
etc., when the issue is
local about our meets and should be resolved with common sense and
mutual understanding. Take whatever photos you want to take, all I am
saying is ask first.
Regards,
Rony.
___________________________________________________________
NEW Yahoo! Cars - sell your car and browse thousands of new and used cars online!
http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/
1:15 p.m.
On Sunday 26 February 2006 12:43 pm, Rony Bill wrote:
Dinesh Joshi wrote:
local about our meets and should be resolved with
common sense and
mutual understanding. Take whatever photos you want to take, all I
am saying is ask first.
There is the complication of all photographers asking all participants
for permission so as to eliminate the minority from the photo. We
would have to start an hour earlier. Besides as i said earlier it
does not prevent someone with intent doing what he pleases.
--
rgds
jtd
1:45 p.m.
Sometime Today, RB cobbled together some glyphs to say:
mutual understanding. Take whatever photos you want to
take, all I am
saying is ask first.
do it the other way around. if you see someone taking photos, ask him
not to take photos of you. It's not hard to spot a photographer.
--
The flow chart is a most thoroughly oversold piece of program documentation.
-- Frederick Brooks, "The Mythical Man Month"
25 Feb
25 Feb
11:04 p.m.
Sometime Today, RB cobbled together some glyphs to say:
respecting an individual's choice to not have his
picture posted on
the internet.
You don't have that choice. Your choices are limited to attending the
meet and posing for a group picture. Lug meetings are not private
events, they are open to the public. Anything you say or do, your
presence, and appearance are all public when you attend a lug meet.
--
Treat end of file conditions in a uniform manner.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plaugher)
1 Mar
1 Mar
3:21 p.m.
On 2/25/06, Rony Bill <ronbillypop(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
We are going off track. The discussion is about our meets and respecting
an individual's choice to not have his picture posted on the internet.
This is a mail Robert sent to GNU classpath mailing list asking for
permission to put pictures (of FOSSDEM 2006) online.
From: *Robert Schuster <theBohemian(a)gmx.net>*
To: *GNU Classpath <classpath(a)gnu.org>*
Date: *Feb 28, 2006 6:58 PM*
Subject: *FOSDEM'06 Photos*
Hi friends,
this was a great weekend which I really enjoyed! As you may have noticed I
took
a lot of photos ;) and I plan to make them available for you soon.
I thought it would be a good idea to upload them to a service like
flickr.com
and that is why I wrote this mail.
1) Is flickr.com acceptable for you? (If not, is there a free - in the sense
of
freedom - service that provides the same features?)
2) Are you OK with showing a picture of you online? If not please drop me a
short notice off-list. I will wait until Sunday (2006-03-05) for possible
complains. If no one resists I will put the pictures online otherwise I send
them to all of you via email.
I am looking forward meeting you again at FOSDEM '07 and other events in
between. :)
cya
Robert
--
"Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history.
`Don't bother us with politics', respond those who don't want to learn."
-- Richard Stallman
Me scribbles at http://www.pravi.co.nr
26 Feb
26 Feb
5:35 p.m.
If some story that has public interest (basically acts that usurp the
commons, acts leading to violation of the law /
other's rights) was
published with photos from even a private area I think it would be
fully justified.
who defines public interest?? Reporters out to for a story to save their
jobs?? I font know if u know this, but recently at a private celebration in
chennai.. tamil newspapermen took photographs of a couple getting cosy.. and
this was published as how our culture is getting westernised .. and all that
culture assasination BS.. does this usurp the commons, in conservative
chennai probably.. but is it justified.. I think not...
We do have many such definitions where photography
is restricted due to "security" and
"public interest". Our railway
stations and airports for example. Never mind that you could walk in
from jari mari or fire a missile from the slums surrounding it.
On a side note my cousin was shooting with a camcorder recently at
Matheran. Some girls were walking around. One of them jumped up and
started creating a ruckus. My cousin refused to erase his recording
and told them to get out of public places if they dont want to be
photographed.
wat about just basic courtsey of not photographin a person if he doesnt want
to be on camera??
--
Puneet
25 Feb
25 Feb
8:56 p.m.
Arun K. Khan wrote:
Rony, you would have to avoid all _public_
meetings/conferences/summits etc., not just Linux meets. In all such
events that I have attended (I am sure others will agree) pictures
are taken of those on the stage as well as in the audience - without
exception.
Yes Arun, but the audience is not identified individually or named from
left to right. We are an open list that can be accessed even by
outsiders. So it is even more important that individual identities are
guarded and we concentrate on making members more relaxed about getting
together, instead of having the sword of public pictures hanging over
their heads. It should be a matter of choice and this choice should be
respected by all.
Regards,
Rony.
___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security
Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
10:04 p.m.
Sometime Today, RB cobbled together some glyphs to say:
left to right. We are an open list that can be
accessed even by
outsiders. So it is even more important that individual identities are
Yeah, you already write with your real name, so what's the big deal. If
you really want anonymity, then use a pseudonym, connect via an
anonymising proxy, and don't attend meets.
I was actually anonymous in my first lug meet. People knew I was there
because I'd signed the attendance, they just didn't know who I was.
That was a fateful day in Jan 2000.
Philip
--
I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of the demigodic party.
-- Dennis Ritchie
26 Feb
26 Feb
4:34 a.m.
On Saturday 25 February 2006 16:34, Philip Tellis wrote:
I was actually anonymous in my first lug meet. People
knew I was
there because I'd signed the attendance, they just didn't know who I
was. That was a fateful day in Jan 2000.
Haha. Same here for the last meet :)
--
Dinesh A. Joshi
1:20 a.m.
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 05:08, Rony Bill wrote:
If anyone is clicking pics for a personal album, its
ok but I
strongly believe in seeking permission from the persons in the pics,
if the pics are to be posted on a public bulletin board like the
internet. Otherwise let there be a clear policy stating that those
who attend the meets will be photographed and the pics will be posted
on the net. Then let the members choose to attend or not.
May be everyone in appearing in the background on CNN or any other news
channel should start suing them because they are beaming their pictures
without their permission ;)
--
Dinesh A. Joshi
25 Feb
25 Feb
9:19 p.m.
Dinesh Joshi wrote:
May be everyone in appearing in the background on CNN or any other news
channel should start suing them because they are beaming their pictures
without their permission ;)
The news channel does not reveal their identity. Thats the real issue,
not just the pics.
Regards,
Rony.
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
26 Feb
26 Feb
11:26 a.m.
On Saturday 25 February 2006 9:19 pm, Rony Bill wrote:
Dinesh Joshi wrote:
Pointless. Suppose i photograph Rony Bill and put his photo in Kal
Nirnay (yeah that's bigger than all the newspapers put together) with
his name. Who cares except Rony Bill and his friends. But if it were
accompanied by some article then many others would get interested.
Identity makes sense only in a particular context. Eg. voter id
cards, pan cards, tpin numbers, driving licence etc. all of these are
"public" documents which put a picture to a name, all of these are
completely vulnerable to theft. The recent public issue fiasco comes
to mind. The holy grail of control freaks (mostly brain dead
governments and security agencies) is full of holes
It is trivial to create a false identity, if u need to subvert the
system. If that is the case then a "true" identity is just a mirage.
If sufficient numbers went about creating false identities then
privacy would be more or less protected.
--
rgds
jtd
May be everyone in appearing in the background on
CNN or any
other news channel should start suing them because they are
beaming their pictures without their permission ;)
The news channel does not reveal their identity. Thats the real
issue, not just the pics.
5:16 p.m.
On Saturday 25 February 2006 15:49, Rony Bill wrote:
Dinesh Joshi wrote:
Neither is this mailing list revealing anybody's identity. Only
photographs are put up. People are curious and ask "whos who?". Thats a
different issue.
--
Dinesh A. Joshi
May be everyone in appearing in the background on
CNN or any other
news channel should start suing them because they are beaming their
pictures without their permission ;)
The news channel does not reveal their identity. Thats the real
issue, not just the pics.
23 Feb
23 Feb
11:31 a.m.
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 7:02 pm, Abhishek Daga wrote:
false. I was in Goa ;-)
On Tuesday 21
February 2006 08:56, Anurag wrote:
*snip*
> * Pictures:
> Pictures taken in this meet have been posted on ILUG-BOM
> picture gallery ``http://db.ilug-bom.org.in/pics/''.
So I am pretty sure that the gentleman in this picture in the first
row, second from left is JTD. true? false? :)
23 Feb
23 Feb
11:20 p.m.
--- Dinesh Joshi <dinesh.a.joshi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday 23 February 2006 13:01, Amol Hatwar
wrote:
Oh, what the heck.. To hell with tact...
JTD.. We know you are one of the old guys.. maybe not this one. but
which one? :O)
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
This can turn into a contest: "Identify the
Glugger" :)
Regards,
ah
hehe. whose the old guy in the first row? 
24 Feb
24 Feb
9:59 a.m.
Abhishek Daga wrote:
--- Dinesh Joshi <dinesh.a.joshi(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
He is here, Just below the ceiling fan,
http://db.ilug-bom.org.in/pics/main.php?g2_view=core:ShowItem&g2_itemId…
http://db.ilug-bom.org.in/pics/main.php?g2_view=core:ShowItem&g2_itemId…
Don't misunderstand again, he is having black hair ;-)
Hope JTD will not have any objection!
/Benoy
On Thursday 23 February 2006 13:01, Amol Hatwar
wrote:
Oh, what the heck.. To hell with tact...
JTD.. We know you are one of the old guys.. maybe not this one. but
which one? :O)
This can turn into a contest: "Identify the
Glugger" :)
Regards,
ah
hehe. whose the old guy in the first row?
11:31 a.m.
On Friday 24 February 2006 9:59 am, benoy wrote:
Abhishek Daga wrote:
Ya that is me. I identified myself in some of the 2002 HBCSE meets but
the pics were too dark just like the abv links. I have some grey hair
and accept natures idiocity without diving into the nearest hair dye
vat ;-). Wonder what's happened to the telomere repair technology.
--
rgds
jtd
--- Dinesh Joshi <dinesh.a.joshi(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
He is here, Just below the ceiling fan,
http://db.ilug-bom.org.in/pics/main.php?g2_view=core:ShowItem&g2_it
emId=232
http://db.ilug-bom.org.in/pics/main.php?g2_view=core:ShowItem&g2_it
emId=262 Don't misunderstand again, he is having black hair ;-)
Hope JTD will not have any objection! On Thursday 23 February 2006 13:01, Amol Hatwar
wrote:
Oh, what the heck.. To hell with tact...
JTD.. We know you are one of the old guys.. maybe not this one.
but which one? :O) This can turn into a contest: "Identify the
Glugger" :)
Regards,
ah
hehe. whose the old guy in the first row?
11:44 a.m.
On Friday 24 February 2006 11:31 am, JTD wrote:
> >
> > JTD.. We know you are one of the old guys.. maybe not this one.
> > but which one? :O)
>
> He is here, Just below the ceiling fan,
> http://db.ilug-bom.org.in/pics/main.php?g2_view=core:ShowItem&g2_
>it emId=232
Before curiosity kills a few cats here is better shot.
http://db.ilug-bom.org.in/pics/
main.php?g2_view=core:ShowItem&g2_itemId=256
I am wearing a t shirt and standing in front of Prof. Arya (gray
hair).
--
rgds
jtd
10:40 a.m.
hehe. whose the old guy in the first row?
Dinesh A. Joshi
----------------------------------
--I wonder, where is Dinesh Sitting?...
regards
dk
1 Mar
1 Mar
10:54 a.m.
----- Original Message --- --
From: "Dinesh Joshi" <dinesh.a.joshi(a)gmail.com>
On Friday 24 February 2006 05:10, Dinesh Kumar wrote:
Dinesh Joshi, of course.
Regards
Dinesh
--I wonder, where is Dinesh Sitting?...
Who? Dinesh Shah, me or you? :P
--
Dinesh A. Joshi
10:56 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dinesh Joshi" <dinesh.a.joshi(a)gmail.com>
Dinesh Joshi, of course.
Guess :)
Dinesh A. Joshi
Clues?...:)
6234
days inactive
6245
days old
48 comments
15 participants
participants (15)
-
Abhishek Daga -
Amol Hatwar -
Anurag -
Arun K. Khan -
benoy -
Dinesh Joshi -
Dinesh Kumar -
JTD -
Mitul Limbani -
Philip Tellis -
Puneet Lakhina -
Rony Bill -
Sanket Medhi -
Vinayak Hegde -
प्रव ीण् ए (Praveen A)