Dear Vaibhav,
As far I know,
For example if U add this in /etc/resolv.conf
search redhat.com
it would mean that when U want to place a query like
ping mail.redhat.com
due to the addition of the search keyword in
resov.conf
U could just type
ping mail
it would automatically ping
mail.redhat.com
Due to the ' search ' keyword it appends queried
hostname to the domain mentioned next to search to
every query U make
Correct me If I am wrong ...
Always waiting to upgrade myself ..
Hope I am of some Help
Regards,
Shailesh
Vaibahv wrote :
---------------------------------------------------
Hi All,
This sure is a too fundamental a question, and I could
not get an
understandable answer, hence I am seeking help here.
What is the meaning of "search foo.com" & "domain
foo.com" in
resolv.conf
resolv.conf contains a list of NS <as provided by
ISPs> which will do
domain to IP lookup... so then what will searched on
foo.com ??
Diff. betwee search foo.com & domains foo.com
Trying to set my fundas correct... No flames pls.
Thank you.
Vai
=======================================================
===================================================================
They say LOVE is BLIND .................
But MARRIAGE is definitely an EYE OPENER ???
===================================================================
________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your life partner online
Go to: http://yahoo.shaadi.com/india-matrimony
Hi All,
This sure is a too fundamental a question, and I could not get an understandable answer, hence I am seeking help here.
What is the meaning of "search foo.com" & "domain foo.com" in resolv.conf
resolv.conf contains a list of NS <as provided by ISPs> which will do domain to IP lookup... so then what will searched on foo.com ??
Diff. betwee search foo.com & domains foo.com
Trying to set my fundas correct... No flames pls.
Thank you.
Vai
> wxPython works on all linux distros - install it from source. If it
> gives seg faults, it means it is not properly installed. To test
> wxpython installation, download the wxpython demo and try to run it.
> If the demo doesnt work then you need to fix the wxpython
> installation.
> --
> regards
> kg
>
OK: So tried installing wxPython. (on an FC3)
wxPython2.6-devel-gtk2-ansi-2.6.0.0-fc2_py2.3.i386.rpm
Failed dependencies:
wxPython2.6-gtk2-ansi = 2.6.0.0 is needed by (i installed this)
WxPython2.6-devel-gtk2-ansi-2.6.0.0-fc2_py2.3.i386
Failed depedencies:
wxPython-common-gtk2-unicode-2.5.5.1-fc2_py2.3.i386.rpm
(installed this)
But when i try and install wxPython2.5-devel-*
i continue to get the message as above.
wxPython2.6-gtk2-ansi = 2.6.0.0 is needed by
wxPython2.6-devel-gtk2-ansi-2.6.0.0-fc2_py2.3.i386
Any clues?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
To help you make the most of what is likely your first experience with
an Open Source desktop, Novell has developed a comprehensive
self-study guide to help you get up and running smoothly and
effectively on the NEW Novell Linux Desktop 9.
This is a PDF guide free for download and distribution
http://www.novell.com/training/train_product/nld.html
--- sherlock(a)vsnl.com wrote:
> On Thursday 28 April 2005 12:53, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 Apr 2005 1:49 am, Keith Fernandez wrote:
> > > Disclaimer
> > > information in this mail is confidential and is intended solely
> > > for the addressee. Access to this mail by anyone else is
> > > unauthorized. Any copying or further distribution beyond the
> > > original recipient is not intended and may be unlawful. The
> > > opinion expressed in this mail is that of the sender and do not
> > > necessarily reflect that of Reliance"
>
> The last line is necessary methinks, considering various opinions
> being expressed by members of Reliance, which of necessity do
> not reflect those of the other opinions being so expressed.
>
> >
> > please dont send me confidential mail - i cant be trusted
>
> That qualifies you as a recipient - you might even be invited to
> express an opinion ;-)
>
> rgds
> jtd
>
haha..
and ouch! that was way below the belt. i am sure many are squirming in their
seats. and some in high offices.
Schadenfreude. si?
:)
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
On Thursday 28 April 2005 16:43, Abhishek Daga wrote:
> --- sherlock(a)vsnl.com wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 April 2005 12:53, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> > > On Thursday 28 Apr 2005 1:49 am, Keith Fernandez wrote:
> > > > Disclaimer
> > > > information in this mail is confidential and is intended
> > > > solely for the addressee. Access to this mail by anyone else
> > > > is unauthorized. Any copying or further distribution beyond
> > > > the original recipient is not intended and may be unlawful.
> > > > The opinion expressed in this mail is that of the sender and
> > > > do not necessarily reflect that of Reliance"
> >
> > The last line is necessary methinks, considering various opinions
> > being expressed by members of Reliance, which of necessity do
> > not reflect those of the other opinions being so expressed.
> >
> > > please dont send me confidential mail - i cant be trusted
> >
> > That qualifies you as a recipient - you might even be invited to
> > express an opinion ;-)
> >
> > rgds
> > jtd
>
> haha..
> and ouch! that was way below the belt. i am sure many are squirming
> in their seats. and some in high offices.
> Schadenfreude. si?
Nope. But then some miseries naturally follow others - like opinions
following Reliance mcap which boils faster than oil prices from
40000 cr. to 100000 cr (at least in the press releases).
At this rate we should hand over ourselves the Ambanis who will have
eliminated poverty in a jiffy.
rgds
jtd
On Thursday 28 April 2005 12:53, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On Thursday 28 Apr 2005 1:49 am, Keith Fernandez wrote:
> > Disclaimer
> > information in this mail is confidential and is intended solely
> > for the addressee. Access to this mail by anyone else is
> > unauthorized. Any copying or further distribution beyond the
> > original recipient is not intended and may be unlawful. The
> > opinion expressed in this mail is that of the sender and do not
> > necessarily reflect that of Reliance"
The last line is necessary methinks, considering various opinions
being expressed by members of Reliance, which of necessity do
not reflect those of the other opinions being so expressed.
>
> please dont send me confidential mail - i cant be trusted
That qualifies you as a recipient - you might even be invited to
express an opinion ;-)
rgds
jtd
Greetings Everybody,
We have immediate openings for the following postions:
1. Programmers: having atleast 2 yrs experience in C, C++ programming on Linux
2. Programmers: having atleast 1 yr experience in LAMP (PHP/Perl)
3. DBA's
Those interested may send their profiles to admin(a)ospians.com or jobs(a)pearlconsultants.com at the earliest.
Regards,
Aishwarya
Dinesh J Dalvi <ddlinux(a)rediffmail.com> wrote:
Hi
I'm using qmail as SMTP Server, From client side when I send msg. it shows msg. gone. but not reaches to destination. I don't know where msg. going. What is this problem, Can anyone help me?
Dinesh Dalvi
Please send log file so that we can guess what is problem
Pramila
--
http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
