>Amish Munshi <amish_munshi(a)fastmail.fm> wrote:
>__________
> >On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 12:01 +0530, Rishi wrote:
> >> I know Google Groups 2 is in beta right now... but would you
>guys (moderators)
> >
> >I know that my reason is not practical, but on paper this stays true.
>>""""Why should all of us user servers located in US to send and receive
>>mails? If we have a mailing list mail server located in India, we live
>>in India, and our personal mail servers (hopefully) are in India. Why
> >should we waste international bandwidth on this?"""
>>
>More important, even if you have indian servers and an indian ISP,
>you use international bandwidth. Last I checked a month ago, no ISP
>in india provided interconnect to each other. So, you use siffy at
>home to connect to vsnl email accounts at bom4 server in mumbai,
>your data goes through some gateway in USA bcause vsnl and siffy
>refuse to interconnect.
>
>I don't know whose fault it is, but I have been told govt is
>planning to force large ISPs to interconnect here.
This is discussed extensively on another list (exchinnet at
yahoogroups). Several interested independent persons campaigned
strongly for an 'exchange' (the facility that handles such a task -
google for 'IX' if you would like to learn about this) and to the
total dismay of all, the ISPs complicitly handed over the job to GoI,
which later set up NIXI in Delhi and Mumbai.
Unfortunately, NIXI is almost completely underutilised, mainly
because its terms and conditions for interconnection are perverse and
unrealistic. The result is the major ISPs, several of whom have
created their own international bandwidth, do not use NIXI, and it is
too expensive and too much hard work for the small ISPs (assuming
there are any left), because a little professional networking skill
is needed for their admins, who mostly don't exist at any real level
of competence.
I cannot see any reason why the government should 'force' anyone to
do anything these days. It has consistently hogged tasks that it had
no business to get into over the years, probably because when they
succeed (and even when they don't: who looks once the ribbon cutting
is over?) the politicians look good and the bureaucrats are given
shiny awards for their dedicated years of spouting Sanskrit slokas.
If the exchange is run on a professional basis then not only mail but
even mirrors will come up fast here, saving uncountable millions of
bucks in international bandwidth now being wasted on pointless
shuttling up and down of packets that need never have hit those
circuits. What the government needs to do is ensure that the playing
fields are as level as possible for all kinds of participants, not
only MNCs or conglomerates with cross interests in a number of media
plays.
Sadly, even the smaller ISPs have not acted to rectify this
situation, because (and this is my opinion, Devdas - who also was
active on exchinnet - is in a far better position to comment) the
best thing to do was set up an alternative to NIXI. They didn't do it
two years ago, and I doubt they will now, when they are even more
squeezed on revenues.
--
Vickram