2008/11/26 vinay sreenivasa vinay@itforchange.net:
The proposed letter is pasted below. If you and/or your organization wish to endorse this letter, please indicate so in response to this email by the midnight of 1st December(India time). Please respond offline and not to the entire mailing list.
I think we should endorse this. What everyone say?
Cheers Praveen
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Praveen A pravi.a@gmail.com wrote:
2008/11/26 vinay sreenivasa vinay@itforchange.net:
The proposed letter is pasted below. If you and/or your organization wish
to
endorse this letter, please indicate so in response to this email by the midnight of 1st December(India time). Please respond offline and not to
the
entire mailing list.
I think we should endorse this. What everyone say?
I support the view. The Internet control should not be monopolised. The decision has to sent by 1st Dec.
2008/11/27 haynes davis haynesdavis@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Praveen A pravi.a@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should endorse this. What everyone say?
I support the view. The Internet control should not be monopolised. The decision has to sent by 1st Dec.
Vinay,
Count on our support. We are endorsing this (as no one spoke against it so far). Hope we get some good traction at IGF meet.
Cheers Praveen
2008/11/28 Praveen A pravi.a@gmail.com
2008/11/27 haynes davis haynesdavis@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Praveen A pravi.a@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should endorse this. What everyone say?
I support the view. The Internet control should not be monopolised. The decision has to sent by 1st Dec.
Vinay,
Count on our support. We are endorsing this (as no one spoke against it so far). Hope we get some good traction at IGF meet.
You can add FSUG Bangalore and Swatantra.Org to the list.
Yes we should prevent monopolization of internet control.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Vikram Vincent vincentvikram@gmail.comwrote:
2008/11/28 Praveen A pravi.a@gmail.com
2008/11/27 haynes davis haynesdavis@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Praveen A pravi.a@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should endorse this. What everyone say?
I support the view. The Internet control should not be monopolised. The decision has to sent by 1st Dec.
Vinay,
Count on our support. We are endorsing this (as no one spoke against it so far). Hope we get some good traction at IGF meet.
You can add FSUG Bangalore and Swatantra.Org to the list.
Vikram Vincent +919448810822 http://swatantra.org/
FSUG-Bangalore mailing list FSUG-Bangalore@mm.gnu.org.in http://mm.gnu.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fsug-bangalore
We endorse it. Please add OpenSpace Bangalore Edwin
2008/11/28 Vikram Vincent vincentvikram@gmail.com
2008/11/28 Praveen A pravi.a@gmail.com
2008/11/27 haynes davis haynesdavis@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Praveen A pravi.a@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should endorse this. What everyone say?
I support the view. The Internet control should not be monopolised. The decision has to sent by 1st Dec.
Vinay,
Count on our support. We are endorsing this (as no one spoke against it so far). Hope we get some good traction at IGF meet.
You can add FSUG Bangalore and Swatantra.Org to the list.
Vikram Vincent +919448810822 http://swatantra.org/
FSUG-Bangalore mailing list FSUG-Bangalore@mm.gnu.org.in http://mm.gnu.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fsug-bangalore
________________________________
From: fsug-bangalore-bounces@mm.gnu.org.in [mailto:fsug-bangalore-bounces@mm.gnu.org.in] On Behalf Of vinay sreenivasa Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 4:17 PM To: Vikram Vincent; Free Software Users Group - Bangalore Cc: anja@itforchange.net Subject: Re: [FSUG-Bangalore] Defending the threat to the public-ness and the egalitarian nature of the Internet Thanks Guys. Will add FSUG and swatantra.org to the list. Who all are coming to the IGF from FSUG? I know that Anivar is coming, is someone else coming too? Thanks, Vinay.
>> when is this..
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Senthil Sundaram (sensunda) sensunda@cisco.com wrote:
From: fsug-bangalore-bounces@mm.gnu.org.in [mailto:fsug-bangalore-bounces@mm.gnu.org.in] On Behalf Of vinay sreenivasa Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 4:17 PM To: Vikram Vincent; Free Software Users Group - Bangalore Cc: anja@itforchange.net Subject: Re: [FSUG-Bangalore] Defending the threat to the public-ness and the egalitarian nature of the Internet
Thanks Guys.
Will add FSUG and swatantra.org to the list.
Who all are coming to the IGF from FSUG? I know that Anivar is coming, is someone else coming too?
Thanks, Vinay.
when is this..
http://igf2008.in/Default.aspx
I think registration is Closed. I am not represnting FSUG in IGF .
Anivar
.
--- On Fri, 28/11/08, Anivar Aravind anivar.aravind@gmail.com wrote:
Who all are coming to the IGF from FSUG? I know that
Anivar is coming, is
someone else coming too?
Thanks, Vinay.
when is this..
http://igf2008.in/Default.aspx
I think registration is Closed. I am not represnting FSUG in IGF .
Too bad! I would love to join you folks over there.
Cheers
--arky
Rakesh 'arky' Ambati Blog [ http://playingwithsid.blogspot.com ]
Did you know? You can CHAT without downloading messenger. Go to http://in.webmessenger.yahoo.com/
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Rakesh 'arky' Ambati < rakesh_ambati@yahoo.com> wrote:
--- On Fri, 28/11/08, Anivar Aravind anivar.aravind@gmail.com wrote:
Who all are coming to the IGF from FSUG? I know that
Anivar is coming, is
someone else coming too?
Thanks, Vinay.
when is this..
http://igf2008.in/Default.aspx
I think registration is Closed. I am not represnting FSUG in IGF .
Too bad! I would love to join you folks over there.
dont worry..onsite registration will begin on the 1st of December. :)
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Praveen A pravi.a@gmail.com wrote:
2008/11/27 haynes davis haynesdavis@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Praveen A pravi.a@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should endorse this. What everyone say?
I support the view. The Internet control should not be monopolised. The decision has to sent by 1st Dec.
Vinay,
Count on our support. We are endorsing this (as no one spoke against it so far). Hope we get some good traction at IGF meet.
+1
It will be good if you can expand the description of "Proprietarisation of standards and code that build the Internet" little bit. if it is not too late. The current description only addresses "use of proprietary and closed standards and code in building the Internet system.". Along with the focus to make Internet protocols as free standards we have to point on data encoding too.
internet should not be polluted by privately owned data formats like mp3, mp4, flash, ppt, doc, DRM embeded media etc . This needed toprevent 1 st point "Increasing corporatisation of the Internet"
Anivar
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Anivar Aravind anivar.aravind@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Praveen A pravi.a@gmail.com wrote:
2008/11/27 haynes davis haynesdavis@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Praveen A pravi.a@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should endorse this. What everyone say?
I support the view. The Internet control should not be monopolised. The decision has to sent by 1st Dec.
Vinay,
Count on our support. We are endorsing this (as no one spoke against it so far). Hope we get some good traction at IGF meet.
+1
It will be good if you can expand the description of "Proprietarisation of standards and code that build the Internet" little bit. if it is not too late. The current description only addresses "use of proprietary and closed standards and code in building the Internet system.". Along with the focus to make Internet protocols as free standards we have to point on data encoding too.
internet should not be polluted by privately owned data formats like mp3, mp4, flash, ppt, doc, DRM embeded media etc . This needed toprevent 1 st point "Increasing corporatisation of the Internet"
Can we add a sentence to that paragraph .
The use of open standards and formats has to be enforced in the Internet, to prevent the users from the forced adherence to non-standard or closed utilities and to ensure the people's freedom of accessibility to information and knowledge.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 4:50 PM, haynes davis haynesdavis@gmail.comwrote:
Can we add a sentence to that paragraph .
The use of open standards and formats has to be enforced in the Internet, to prevent the users from the forced adherence to non-standard or closed utilities and to ensure the people's freedom of accessibility to information and knowledge.
Why cant it be in a much more direct way --with the examples, kind of direct statements
FSUG-Bangalore mailing list FSUG-Bangalore@mm.gnu.org.in http://mm.gnu.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fsug-bangalore
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:29 PM, vinay sreenivasa vinay@itforchange.net wrote:
Hi Anivar,
The point about the encoding of data is good. When we say 'proprietarisation of standards' would that not include data encoding standards also? I sort of assumed it would..
The term used is "Proprietarisation of standards and code that build the Internet" . I feel it only communicate about protocols & APIs and not on Data standards . Anyway since we are late leave it
:-)
Anivar
-
Anivar Aravind -
haynes davis -
jaykumar hs -
OpenSpace -
Praveen A -
Rakesh 'arky' Ambati -
renuka prasad -
Senthil Sundaram (sensunda) -
Vikram Vincent -
vinay sreenivasa